Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39371334›Full record

ArticleJournal of electrical bioimpedance2024

Time-variant left ventricle models for intracardiac impedance analysis.

Daniel Voss, Clara Wemmer, Steffen Leonhardt, Marian Walter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of electrical bioimpedance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel VossChair for Medical Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Clara WemmerChair for Medical Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Steffen LeonhardtChair for Medical Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Marian WalterChair for Medical Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Thus, critically ill patients require continuous monitoring of cardiovascular indicators, such as the left ventricular volume (LVV). Although continuous hemodynamic monitoring of patients is desirable, due to technical limitations, current measurement technologies either require manual intervention of the physician or only provide inaccurate results. Intracardiac impedance measurements are a promising approach for continuous assessment of cardiac function. However, developing and evaluating these methods requires a simulation model of the left ventricle with cardiac motion during an entire cardiac cycle. While many models exist for a fixed ventricle size, to date, no freely available models incorporate time and represent the cardiac motion during a complete cardiac cycle. Therefore, we developed four cardiacmechanical left ventricular models with varying ventricle sizes and complexities. Each model focuses on a different aspect of the geometric shape, thus allowing an isolated analysis of the different influences. This paper presents the development of the models and initial results of the impedance analysis. All measured admittances exhibit a high resemblance for all models and a strong, non-linear correlation with the LVV. A comparison between the models shows how the different geometries affect the impedance. The models, thus, provide a useful basis for the development of LVV estimation algorithms.

Indexed as

FEMheart geometryintracardiac impedanceleft ventricular volumesimulation

Identifiers

PMID39371334
PMCPMC11452780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.