Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39371297›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2024

Assessment of hyperinflation: comparison of Global Lung Function Initiative and European Community for Steel and Coal lung volume reference equations.

Sharyn A Roodenburg, Marlies van Dijk, Sonja W S Augustijn, Karin Klooster, Dirk-Jan Slebos, Jorine E Hartman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sharyn A RoodenburgDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6579-7386
Marlies van DijkDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-1276
Sonja W S AugustijnDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Karin KloosterDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dirk-Jan SlebosDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9555-3422
Jorine E HartmanDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8765-9673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Assessment of static hyperinflation severity is crucial to identify COPD patients eligible for lung volume reduction. The current recommendation of residual volume ≥175% predicted may need to be reconsidered owing to potential differences between the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) and the European Community for Steel and Coal (ECSC) reference equations for residual volume and concerns about using percentage of predicted. Methods: We compared the residual volume reference values derived from the GLI and ECSC equations using mathematically simulated data and used a receiver operating characteristic curve to establish a new GLI-derived z-score cut-off for residual volume using body plethysmography data from patients with severe COPD. Results: The GLI reference equation for residual volume consistently yields a lower predicted residual volume for individuals with an average or below-average height (females ≤163 cm and males ≤177 cm). Our clinical cohort consisted of 1011 patients with COPD (graded using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria as 38% GOLD 3 and 59% GOLD 4). In this cohort, a GLI-derived residual volume z-score of ≥2.9 could accurately replace the ECSC-derived 175% predicted cut-off and a z-score of ≥3.5 was established for the 200% predicted cut-off. Conclusion: There are substantial differences in predicted residual volume values between the GLI and ECSC equations, with the GLI generally yielding a lower predicted residual volume in the majority of individuals. A GLI-derived residual volume z-score of ≥2.9 could be used to replace the currently used cut-off of ≥175% predicted to identify potential lung volume reduction candidates.

Identifiers

PMID39371297
PMCPMC11163279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.