Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39371280›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT

Noise-induced hearing loss: a 10-year analysis of notifications according to the Brazilian Classification of Occupations.

Maria Isabel Pereira de Rezende, Bruna Rafaela Cruz Barbosa, Arthur Henrique Gonçalves, Narciso Ferreira Dos Santos Neto, Luiz Henrique Rodrigues Souza, Lucineia Pinho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The role of the occupational physician in the early detection of occupational diseases.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria Isabel Pereira de RezendeSchool of Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (UNIMONTES), Montes Claros, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0002-7400-3186
Bruna Rafaela Cruz BarbosaSchool of Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (UNIMONTES), Montes Claros, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0003-4674-4849
Arthur Henrique GonçalvesSchool of Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (UNIMONTES), Montes Claros, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-0261-8465
Narciso Ferreira Dos Santos NetoProfessional Master's Degree in Computational Modeling and Systems, UNIMONTES, Montes Claros, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1742-3515
Luiz Henrique Rodrigues SouzaProfessional Master's Degree in Computational Modeling and Systems, UNIMONTES, Montes Claros, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0008-8228-2959
Lucineia PinhoGraduate Program in Primary Health Care, UNIMONTES, Montes Claros, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2947-5806

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Noise-induced hearing loss has a high incidence among Brazilian workers, causing socioeconomic and cognitive impairments. Objectives: To describe noise-induced hearing loss according to professional occupation between 2012 and 2021. Methods: This was a cross-sectional and descriptive study of Brazilian workers affected by noise-induced hearing loss. Data were collected from noise-induced hearing loss notifications filed with the Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação in Brazil. The absolute and relative frequencies of sociodemographic variables and occupational characteristics were assessed. Results: A total of 7,413 cases of noise-induced hearing loss were notified in Brazil. Workers in industrial production were the most affected (56.4%). There was a higher prevalence in White (45.4%), male (87.3%) participants aged between 50 and 59 years (42.5%) from the Southeast region (43%). In this study, 3.5% of participants were temporarily removed from their position, 42.6% reported using personal protective equipment, and 65.7% did not use collective protective equipment. The most prevalent type of noise was continuous noise (33%). Conclusions: Noise-induced hearing loss is prevalent among Brazilian workers and varies according to each occupational group. Cases of noise-induced hearing loss are underreported in Brazil.

Indexed as

hearing losshearing loss, noise-inducednoise, occupationaloccupational health

Identifiers

PMID39371280
PMCPMC11452116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.