Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39371235›Full record

ArticleATS scholar2024

Multiple Goals Theory and Communication Quality Analysis for Fellows Communication Training.

Lauren J Van Scoy, Allison M Scott, Heather Costigan, John Madara, David Chu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ATS scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reply to WalterATS scholar · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lauren J Van ScoyDepartment of Medicine and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0984-1474
Allison M ScottDepartment of Communication, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Heather CostiganDepartment of Medicine and.
John MadaraDepartment of Medicine and.
David ChuDepartment of Medicine and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: End-of-life communication skills are vital to high-quality critical care. Patients and families often report deficiencies in end-of-life communication by providers. However, formalized training is difficult to implement and study on a large scale. Furthermore, curricula are often designed with early-stage clinical trainees in mind and are not tailored to advanced clinician learners. Objective: The goal of this pilot study was to explore educational and practical implications of using Multiple Goals Theory (MGT), Communication Quality Analysis (CQA), and communication logs as a three-pronged, reflective communication curriculum for advanced trainees. Methods: We describe design and qualitative evaluation of a novel, pilot, longitudinal curricular intervention for pulmonary and critical care fellows and program directors at a tertiary academic medical center. The 2-year longitudinal communication curriculum incorporates Results: The sample included 13 pulmonary and critical care medicine fellows and two program directors. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on seven fellow interviews and on 23 communication logs completed. Four themes emerged from interviews: Conclusion: Many scholars have argued that communication theory can impact practice, but few have recognized the potential of theory and methods, such as MGT and CQA, as educational tools. Our findings demonstrate that MGT is a feasible and useful theoretical framework for improving communication skills among advanced trainees, and CQA fosters meaningful self-reflection about practice. Communication logs were not feasible or useful training tools in this context, but CQA workshops helped fulfill the goals of narrative reflection. Next steps are to implement this curriculum in more programs and measure changes in behavior acquisition and clinical care.

Indexed as

communicationfamily meetingsmedical educationqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39371235
PMCPMC11448941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.