ArticleATS scholar2024
Explor-A-Thora: A Novel Three-Dimensionally Printed Pleural Simulator.
Article in ATS scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For procedural education, the shift from the traditional apprenticeship model to simulation-based mastery has become increasingly accepted as the gold standard and has underscored the importance of high-fidelity, cost-effective training options. However, cost-effective pleural procedure simulators providing both realistic haptic feedback and ultrasound compatibility are lacking. Objective: We aimed to create a pleural procedure simulator with characteristics of human tissue, at low cost and with ultrasound compatibility. Methods: This work used design-based research principles and a collaborative rapid iteration approach in collaboration with the University of California, San Francisco, Makers Lab and design-based researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, which led to the creation of a three-dimensionally printed pleural procedure simulator. Results: The needs assessment indicated significant discomfort with pleural procedures and a request for more accessible simulation opportunities. Iterative prototyping resulted in a three-dimensionally printed rib cage and a series of innovations in the fluid pocket and skin layers to provide realistic tactile feedback and ultrasound imaging compatibility. The final model costs significantly less than commercial simulators, with durable components and replaceable parts that can be reused multiple times. Conclusion: The development of a low-cost, high-fidelity pleural procedure simulator addresses the current limitations of commercially available pleural simulators. By integrating three-dimensional printing technology and easily accessible materials, we were able to produce a simulator that closely replicates the feel of human tissue, allows ultrasound use, and is adaptable for different patient anatomies and clinical scenarios. This novel simulator is a scalable solution to elevate the standard of procedural education and ultimately positively affect patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.