ArticleATS scholar2024
Assessment of an Airway Curriculum in a Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellowship Program.
Article in ATS scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endotracheal intubations (EIs) in the intensive care unit are high-risk procedures often performed by pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) providers. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education mandates PCCM fellows' competency in this procedure; however, the learning experiences vary across programs. After conducting a needs assessment, we developed a curriculum unique to our institution to supplement our fellows' existing EI experiences in the operating room and the intensive care unit. Objective: To assess the curriculum's short-term objectives: knowledge acquisition, maintenance, and practical skills 1 year after participation. Methods: We administered a survey to the graduating PCCM fellows for two consecutive years. We designed the comprehensive airway curriculum to include didactic lectures and simulation-based education. The knowledge acquisition and maintenance were measured by administering a 26-question knowledge survey before and after curriculum participation and after 1 year. The fellows also received a practical examination 1 year after participation. To compare knowledge survey scores, we used paired Results: In the needs assessment, 56% of graduating fellows believed they were proficient in performing EI, whereas 33% were undecided and 11% believed they were unprepared. Most believed they would need more than two courses after graduation to be confident in independently performing EIs. Most will only occasionally have backup for EI from anesthesiology or emergency medicine in their future jobs. One identified barrier to learning EI was the lack of a formal curriculum. In the knowledge assessment, nine first-year fellows participated in the curriculum. The cohort's mean presurvey score was 13.0 (standard deviation [SD], 4.5) versus 18.6 (SD, 3.6) mean postsurvey score. One year after participation, the mean survey score was 17 (SD, 1.2). The postsurvey and 1-year postparticipation survey scores were significantly higher than the presurvey scores ( Conclusion: The airway curriculum enhances fellows' knowledge acquisition and maintenance 1 year after participation. The practical examination 1 year after participation highlighted the skills retained and those still needing improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.