ArticlePatient preference and adherence2024
A Mobile Application for Anticoagulation Management in Patients After Heart Valve Replacement: A Usability Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health-Related Quality of Life and Associated Factors Among Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Replacement: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- The Effectiveness of Digital Therapeutics Intervention in Oral Anticoagulation Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Individualized anticoagulation therapy is a major challenge for patients after heart valve replacement. Mobile applications assisted by Artificial intelligence (AI) have great potential to meet the individual needs of patients. The study aimed to develop an AI technology-assisted mobile application (app) for anticoagulation management, understand patients' acceptance of such applications, and determine its feasibility. Methods: After using the mobile application for anticoagulation management for 2 weeks, patients, doctors, and nurses rated its usability using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Additionally, semi-structured interviews were conducted with some patients, doctors, and nurses to gain insights about their thoughts and suggestions regarding the procedure. Results: The study comprised 80 participants, including 38 patients, 18 doctors, and 24 nurses. The average SUS score for patients was 82.37±5.45; for doctors, it was 84.17±5.82; and for nurses, it was 81.88±6.44. This means the patients, physicians, and nurses rated the app highly usable. Semi-structured interviews were conducted on the app's usability with 18 participants (six nurses, three physicians, and nine patients). The interview results revealed that patients found the application of anticoagulation management simple and convenient, with high expectations for a precise dosage recommendation of anticoagulant drugs. Some patients expressed concerns regarding personal information security. Both doctors and nurses believed that elderly patients needed assistance from young family members to use the app and that it could improve patients' anticoagulant self-management ability. Some nurses also mentioned that the use of the app brought great convenience for transitional care. Conclusion: This study confirmed the feasibility of using an AI technology-assisted mobile application for anticoagulation management in patients after heart valve replacement. To further develop this application, challenges lie in continuously improving the accuracy of recommended drug doses, obtaining family support, and ensuring information security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.