Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39371121›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Identifying individuals at risk for surgical supravalvar aortic stenosis by polygenic risk score with graded phenotyping.

D Liu, C B Mervis, M D Levin, E Biamino, M F Bedeschi, M C Digilio, G M Squeo, R Villa, S Osgood, J A Freeman and 6 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

D LiuNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
C B MervisDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
M D LevinNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
E BiaminoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Turin, Italy.
M F BedeschiFondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Medical Genetic Unit, Milan, Italy.
M C DigilioMedical Genetics Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
G M SqueoLaboratory of Regulatory and Functional Genomics, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo (Foggia), Italy.
R VillaFondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Medical Genetic Unit, Milan, Italy.
S OsgoodNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J A FreemanNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
N RajaNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
G MerlaDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
A E RobertsDepartment of Cardiology and Division of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
C A MorrisDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
L R OsborneDepartments of Medicine and Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
B A KozelNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

GENOTYPE/PHENOTYPE CORRELATIONS IN WILLIAMS SYNDROMER01NS035102 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI MERVIS, CAROLYN B. · 1996 to 2009
$12.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a previous pathway-based, extreme phenotype study, we identified 1064 variants associated with supravalvar aortic stenosis (SVAS) severity in people with Williams syndrome (WS) and either no SVAS or surgical SVAS. Here, we use those variants to develop and test polygenic risk scores (PRS). We used the clumping and thresholding (CT) approach on the full 1064 variants and a 427-variant subset that was part of 13 biologically relevant pathways identified in the previous study. We also used a lasso approach on the full set. We were able to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of >0.99 for the two CT PRS methods, using only 622 and 320 variants respectively when 2/3 of the initial 217 participants data were used for training and 1/3 for testing. The lasso performed less well. We then evaluated the performance of those PRS variant sets on an additional group of 138 patients with WS with intermediate severity SVAS and found a misclassification rate of <10% between the surgical and intermediate groups, suggesting potential for clinical utility of the score.

Identifiers

PMID39371121
PMCPMC11451708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.