Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39371066›Full record

ReviewCurrent health sciences journal

Impact of Imaging Techniques in the Assessment of Gallstone Pancreatitis.

Suzana Măceș, Ștefan Pătrașcu, Cristiana Iulia Dumitrescu, Marian Răzvan Bălan, Luana Corina Lascu, Adriana Roxana Lazarovici, Tudor Constantin Bratiloveanu, Sarmis Marian Săndulescu, Silviu Iulian Bordu, Mădălin Cristian Moraru and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Suzana MăceșPhD student, Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Ștefan PătrașcuDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova.
Cristiana Iulia DumitrescuDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Marian Răzvan BălanPhD student, Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Luana Corina LascuDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging , University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Adriana Roxana LazaroviciDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging , University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Tudor Constantin BratiloveanuDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova.
Sarmis Marian SăndulescuDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova.
Silviu Iulian BorduDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova.
Mădălin Cristian MoraruPhD student, Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Marin Valeriu ȘurlinDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova.
Daniela DumitrescuDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging , University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the category of biliary disease, gallstones registered an increase during the last years, approximately 6% of men and 9% of women being affected by the pathology in the United States only. In western countries between 10-20% of the adult population is suffering from cholelithiasis. Although increasing age is a major risk factor for their formation, late studies correlate gallstones appearance with an age decrease for the onset of symptoms. We therefore face a younger population manifesting pain and sometimes functional disability. In accordance with statistical analysis, the economic impact of gallstones in highly industrialized countries such as United States produces costs of up to 6.5 billion dollars annually. In this context, the appropriate timing for intervention becomes a factor of major interest. The present review uses 28 articles and specialized literature. Article selection was based on keywords and followed the effectiveness of imaging investigation such as ultrasound, CT and MRI for patients diagnosed with cholelithiasis. Since a direct comparison between the imaging investigation techniques is not concluding we have tried to establish the sensitivity and specificity offered by each imaging assessment. The comparative analysis revealed a p Kruskal-Wallis <0.001 for sensitivity and p Kruskal-Wallis=0.474 for specificity.

Indexed as

acute pancreatitischolelithiasisGallstonesimaging investigation

Identifiers

PMID39371066
PMCPMC11447498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.