ArticleThe Biochemical journal2024
Exploring the dynamics and interactions of the N-myc transactivation domain through solution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
Article in The Biochemical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting the MYCN interaction network in neuroblastoma.Bioscience reports · 2026Review
- The N-Myc MB0-MBI region interacts specifically and dynamically with the N-lobe of Aurora kinase A.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Mechanism of interaction between the transactivation domain of N-myc and the DNA-binding surface of TFIIIC5.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Bora bridges Aurora-A activation and substrate recognition of PLK1.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- Aurora A binds to the transactivation domain of c-Myc and recognizes the phosphorylated N-terminal degron motif.The Biochemical journal · 2025Article
- BaNDyT: Bayesian Network modeling of molecular Dynamics Trajectories.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myc proteins are transcription factors crucial for cell proliferation. They have a C-terminal domain that mediates Max and DNA binding, and an N-terminal disordered region culminating in the transactivation domain (TAD). The TAD participates in many protein-protein interactions, notably with kinases that promote stability (Aurora-A) or degradation (ERK1, GSK3) via the ubiquitin-proteasome system. We probed the structure, dynamics and interactions of N-myc TAD using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy following its complete backbone assignment. Chemical shift analysis revealed that N-myc has two regions with clear helical propensity: Trp77-Glu86 and Ala122-Glu132. These regions also have more restricted ps-ns motions than the rest of the TAD, and, along with the phosphodegron, have comparatively high transverse (R2) 15N relaxation rates, indicative of slower timescale dynamics and/or chemical exchange. Collectively these features suggest differential propensities for structure and interaction, either internal or with binding partners, across the TAD. Solution studies on the interaction between N-myc and Aurora-A revealed a previously uncharacterised binding site. The specificity and kinetics of sequential phosphorylation of N-myc by ERK1 and GSK3 were characterised using NMR and resulted in no significant structural changes outside the phosphodegron. When the phosphodegron was doubly phosphorylated, N-myc formed a robust interaction with the Fbxw7-Skp1 complex, but mapping the interaction by NMR suggests a more extensive interface. Our study provides foundational insights into N-myc TAD dynamics and a backbone assignment that will underpin future work on the structure, dynamics, interactions and regulatory post-translational modifications of this key oncoprotein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.