Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39370832›Full record

ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2025

UroARC: A novel surgical risk calculator for older adults undergoing pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery.

Farnoosh Nik-Ahd, Shoujun Zhao, Lufan Wang, W John Boscardin, Kenneth Covinsky, Anne M Suskind

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Farnoosh Nik-AhdDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4726-9894
Shoujun ZhaoDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Lufan WangDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
W John BoscardinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Kenneth CovinskyDepartment of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Anne M SuskindDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8437-3861

Funding

VARC CoreP30AG044281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Alexander Keliimoeanu Smith · 2013 to 2026
$19.9M
Promoting Multidisciplinary Clinical and Translational Science in Aging by Resident InvestigatorsR38AG070171 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Alison Huang, Ashwin Ajit Kotwal · 2021 to 2026
$1.8M
Optimizing surgical decision-making for nursing home residents undergoing surgery for bladder and bowel dysfunctionR01AG058616 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SUSKIND, ANNE M. · 2018 to 2021
$1.7M
National Institute on Aging (NIA) R01AG058616NIANational Institute on Aging (NIA) R38AG07017NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058616NIA NIH HHS R38 AG070171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgeries for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are commonly performed in older adults, many of whom are also frail. A surgical risk calculator for older adults undergoing POP/SUI surgeries that incorporates frailty, a factor known to increase the risk of surgical complications, would be helpful for preoperative counseling but currently does not exist. MATERIALS AND

methodsMedicare Carrier, Outpatient, and MedPAR files were examined for beneficiaries undergoing POP and SUI surgery between 2014 and 2016. A total of 15 POP/SUI categories were examined. The Claims-Based Frailty Index (CFI), a validated measure of frailty in Medicare data, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were deconstructed into their individual variables, and individual variables were entered into stepwise logistic regression models to determine which variables were most highly predictive of 30-day complications and 1-year mortality. To verify the prognostic accuracy for each model for surgical complications of interest, calibration curves and tests of model fit, including C-statistic, Brier scores, and Spiegelhalter p values, were determined.

resultsIn total, 108 479 beneficiaries were included. Among these, 4.7% had CFI scores consistent with mild to severe frailty (CFI≥0.25). A total of 13 prognostic variable categories were found to be most highly predictive of postoperative complications. Calibration curves for each outcome of interest showed models were well-fit. Most models demonstrated high c-statistic values (≥0.7) and high Spiegelhalter p values (≥0.9), indicating good model calibration and excellent discrimination, and low Brier scores (<0.02), indicating high model accuracy.

conclusionsUrologic surgery for older Adults Risk Calculator serves as a novel surgical risk calculator that is readily accessible to both patients and clinicians that specifically factors in components of frailty. Furthermore, this calculator accounts for the heterogeneity of an aging population and can assist in individualized surgical decision-making for these common procedures.

Indexed as

FrailtyPelvic Organ ProlapsePostoperative ComplicationsUrinary Incontinence, StressAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMedicareRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUnited StatesUrologic Surgical Proceduresagingfrailtypelvic floor disorderspelvic organ prolapsepelvic organ prolapse repairstress urinary incontinencesurgical complications

Identifiers

PMID39370832
PMCPMC12001452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.