ReviewInternational journal of molecular medicine2024
Protein biomarkers in assessing kidney quality before transplantation‑current status and future perspectives (Review).
Review in International journal of molecular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- USAG-1 aggravates renal ischemia‒reperfusion injury via promoting GPX4 degradation-induced ferroptosis.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Assisted FTIR Spectroscopy Analysis of Kidney Preservation Fluids for Delayed Graft Function Risk Stratification.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Complete Blood Count in Delayed Graft Function: A Narrative Review.Annals of transplantation · 2026Review
- Plant metabolites: potential treatments for ischemic acute kidney injury.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Advancements in noninvasive techniques for transplant rejection: from biomarker detection to molecular imaging.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Assess Kidney Quality DuringTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To meet the demand for kidney transplants (KTx), organs are frequently retrieved not only from standard criteria donors (SCD; a donor who is aged <50 years and suffered brain death from any number of causes, such as traumatic injuries or a stroke) but also from expanded criteria donors (any donor aged >60 years or donors aged >50 years with two of the following: A history of high blood pressure, a creatinine serum level ≥1.5 mg/dl or death resulting from a stroke). This comes at the cost of a higher risk of primary non‑function (the permanent hyperkalemia, hyperuremia and fluid overload that result in the need for continuous dialysis after KTx), delayed graft function (the need for dialysis session at least once during the first week after KTx), earlier graft loss and urinary complications (vesico‑ureteral reflux, obstruction of the vesico‑ureteral anastomosis, urine leakage). At present, there are no commercially available diagnostic tools for assessing kidney quality prior to KTx. Currently available predictive models based on clinical data, such as the Kidney Donor Profile Index, are insufficient. One promising option is the application of perfusion solutions for protein biomarkers of kidney quality and predictors of short‑ and long‑term outcomes. However, to date, protein markers that can be detected with ELISA, western blotting and cytotoxic assays have not been identified to be a beneficial predictors of kidney quality. These include lactate dehydrogenases, glutathione S‑transferases, fatty acid binding proteins, extracellular histones, IL‑18, neutrophil gelatinase‑associated lipocalin, MMPs and kidney injury molecule‑1. However, novel methods, including liquid chromatography‑mass spectrometry (LC‑MS) and microarrays, allow the analysis of all renal proteins suspended/dissolved in the acellular preservation solution used for kidney storage before KTx (including hypothermic machine perfusion as one of kidney storage methods) e.g. Belzer University of Wisconsin. Recent proteomic studies utilizing LC‑MS have identified complement pathway elements (C3, C1QB, C4BPA, C1S, C1R and C1RL), desmoplakin, blood coagulation pathway elements and immunoglobulin heavy variable 2‑26 to be novel predictors of kidney quality before transplantation. This was because they were found to correlate with estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 and 12 months after kidney transplantation. However, further proteomic studies focusing on distinct markers obtained from hypothermic and normothermic machine perfusion are needed to confirm their predictive value and to improve kidney storage methods. Therefore, the present literature review from PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science was performed with the aims of summarizing the current knowledge on the most frequently studied single protein biomarkers. In addition, novel analytical methods and insights into organ injury during preservation were documented, where future directions in assessing organ quality before kidney transplantation were also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.