Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39370561›Full record

Observational studyColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2024

Anal sphincter function in rectal intussusception and high and low "take-off" external rectal prolapse-A prospective observational study.

Alexander O'Connor, Caroline M Byrne, Nick Heywood, Matthew Davenport, Niels Klarskov, Abhiram Sharma, Edward Kiff, Karen Telford

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Functional and Anatomical Significance of Patulous Anus.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Anal sphincter function in rectal intussusception and high and low "take-off" external rectal prolapse-A prospective observational study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexander O'ConnorFaculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Caroline M ByrneFaculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Nick HeywoodDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, East Lancashire NHS Hospitals Trust, Blackburn, UK.
Matthew DavenportDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Niels KlarskovDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Abhiram SharmaFaculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Edward KiffDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Karen TelfordFaculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Royal College of Surgeons of England
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimRectal intussusception (RI) and external rectal prolapse (ERP) are associated with anal sphincter dysfunction. The aim of this study was to examine sphincter function with anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR) in RI and two distinct phenotypes of ERP termed high and low "take-off".

methodsA prospective study of patients with RI and ERP attending a tertiary pelvic floor unit. Clinical data, AAR, and conventional anal manometry were analysed according to the Oxford prolapse grade.

resultsA total of 108 (102 [94%] female, median age 62 years [range: 26-95]) patients were recruited into three groups according to prolapse grade: Oxford grades I and II (intrarectal RI, n = 34), Oxford grades III and IV (intra-anal RI, n = 35) and Oxford grade V (ERP, n = 39). As the grade of prolapse increased, resting AAR measurements of opening pressure, opening elastance, closing pressure, and closing elastance decreased (p < 0.001). Maximum resting pressure with manometry was reduced in ERP and intra-anal RI compared to intrarectal RI (p < 0.001). However, incremental squeeze function was not different between the three groups with either AAR or manometry (p > 0.05). There were no differences in AAR or manometry variables between grade IV RI (n = 18) and high take-off ERP (n = 20) (p > 0.05). By contrast, opening pressure (p = 0.010), closing pressure (p = 0.019) and elastance (p = 0.022) were reduced in low take-off ERP (n = 19).

conclusionIncreasing rectal prolapse grade is associated with reduced anal sphincter function at rest indicating internal anal sphincter dysfunction. Physiological differences exist between high and low take-off ERP with sphincter function in the former similar to that seen in grade IV RI.

Indexed as

Anal CanalIntussusceptionManometryRectal ProlapseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPressureProspective StudiesRectal DiseasesSeverity of Illness Indexanal acoustic reflectometryanal manometryfaecal incontinencerectal intussusceptionrectal prolapse

Identifiers

PMID39370561
PMCPMC11649865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.