Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39370552›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

Cancer genetic counseling via telegenetics and telephone: A qualitative study exploring the experience of patients and genetic counselors in an Australian cancer genetics context.

Jessica Finney, Verna Fargas, Tina Gonzalez, Natalie Taylor, Claire E Wakefield, Kathy Tucker, Erin Turbitt, Rachel Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Large-Scale Population Screening forBreast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica FinneyPrince of Wales Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8714-5568
Verna FargasUniversity of Technology Sydney UTS Graduate School of Health, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia.
Tina GonzalezDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3680-2350
Natalie TaylorSchool of Population Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0280-0883
Claire E WakefieldSchool of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7704-7067
Kathy TuckerPrince of Wales Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Erin TurbittUniversity of Technology Sydney UTS Graduate School of Health, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6650-9702
Rachel WilliamsPrince of Wales Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6353-944X

Funding

Cancer Institute NSW 13/TRC/1-03National Health and Medical Research Council 1143767National Health and Medical Research Council 2008300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demand for direct-to-patient (DTP) telegenetics (genetics services delivered via videoconferencing) in genetic counseling practice has rapidly increased, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent telegenetics literature is mostly quantitative and not in the Australian context. A qualitative interview study was conducted to address this gap. This research investigated the experiences of patients and genetic counselors (GCs), enrolled in a randomized controlled trial, using telegenetics and telephone for cancer genetic counseling appointments. Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews with patients (n = 22) and GCs (n = 6) were conducted following patient randomization to either a telephone or telegenetics genetic counseling appointment. The interviews explored participant's experiences of telegenetics and compared DTP telegenetics with telephone and in-person delivery. Codebook thematic analysis was used to develop topic summaries from the data. Patient and GC participants noted positive experiences of telegenetics; with key benefits reported as reduced travel time, time and cost saving, ease, convenience, efficiency, and comfortability. Technical issues and privacy concerns were highlighted as potential disadvantages of telegenetics. All but one patient felt sufficiently emotionally supported while using telegenetics. Telegenetics has both benefits and limitations; however, generally, this cohort found telegenetics to be a suitable and acceptable mode of delivery for genetic counseling with many advantages over in-person or telephone appointments. Further studies should be conducted to provide evidence for the long-term implementation of telegenetics, regardless of any future COVID-19 pandemic lockdown restrictions.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingNeoplasmsTelephoneAdultAustraliaCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchTelemedicinecommunicationCOVID‐19genetic counseling cancer geneticstelegeneticstelemedicinetelephone

Identifiers

PMID39370552
PMCPMC11953582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.