ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024
A new surgical technique of robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy without re-docking in a single position: a single center experience.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A nephroureterectomy conventionally consists of two independent section, which will considerably prolong the operation time. We developed a novel surgical technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy without re-docking in a single position and aimed to access the safety, feasibility, and efficiency of our novel surgical technique. From August 2021 to October 2023, 53 patients who received robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy were retrospectively enrolled in this study. 25 patients underwent traditional nephroureterectomy and 28 patients underwent single-position nephroureterectomy. The basic characteristics of the enroll patients, perioperative parameters, and oncological outcomes were gathered and compared between novel technique robotic surgery group and traditional surgery group. The basic characteristics between two groups had no significantly difference except for the proportion of anticoagulation therapy. The operation time in novel technique robotic surgery group was shorter than that in traditional robotic surgery group, although there was no significant difference (p = 0.403). Lymph-node dissection in novel technique robotic surgery group was obvious more common than that in traditional robotic surgery group (p = 0.037), while the incision length in novel technique robotic surgery group was obviously shorter than that in traditional robotic surgery group (p < 0.001). The oncological outcomes showed no difference between two groups. Compared with traditional robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, the innovative surgical technique of robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in a single position showed the advantages of less surgical time, streamlined lymph-node dissection, less trauma, and expedited postoperative recovery, which is worth promoting in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39370475What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.