Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39370040›Full record

ReviewKidney international2024

Urinary biomarkers for active Lupus Nephritis that have survived independent validation across cohorts.

Sonja Vodehnal, Chandra Mohan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Lupus nephritis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular and Cellular Mediators of Renal Fibrosis in Lupus Nephritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sonja VodehnalBiomedical Engineering Department, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Chandra MohanBiomedical Engineering Department, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA. Electronic address: cmohan@central.uh.edu.

Funding

Monitoring Disease in LupusR01AR074096 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI CHANDRA MOHAN · 2019 to 2026
$4.5M
Objective Classification of Lupus NephritisR01DK134055 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI CHANDRA MOHAN, Hien Van Nguyen · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
Foreboding Lupus Nephritis in Minority WomanR01DK081872 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MOHAN, CHANDRA · 2009 to 2013
$2.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074096NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK081872NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK134055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most reported biomarkers for lupus nephritis (LN) have not been independently validated across cohorts. Moreover, many of the documented biomarker candidates have been reported to be elevated in LN compared to healthy controls. However, biomarkers that distinguish patients with active LN (ALN) from inactive systemic lupus erythematosus (iSLE) hold significant clinical utility. Hence, our review attempts to identify urine protein biomarkers for LN that have been independently validated across two or more cohorts and exhibit good diagnostic potential for distinguishing ALN from iSLE. PubMed and OVID were screened for studies assessing the diagnostic value of urinary biomarkers in patients with ALN compared to iSLE. Forty peer-reviewed articles were evaluated, encompassing urine biomarker data from 3,411 distinct patients. Of the 32 candidate biomarkers identified, fourteen were repeatedly reported/tested in four or more papers each, namely ALCAM, CCL2 (MCP1), CD163, HAVCR1 (KIM-1), HPGDS, ICAM-1 (CD54), ICAM-2 (CD102), IGFBP-2, LCN2, NCAM-1 (CD56), SELE (E-Selectin), SELL (L-Selectin), TNFSF12 (TWEAK), and VCAM-1, with most exhibiting C-statistics of 0.80 or more across multiple studies when discriminating patients with ALN from iSLE. The 32 reproducibly elevated biomarkers for active LN mapped to nine functional categories. The urinary proteins reported here promise to serve as a liquid biopsy for ALN. Besides representing potential candidates for diagnostic, monitoring, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers in LN, they also provide a window into potential molecular processes within the kidney that may be driving LN. Thus, ongoing advances in proteomics, which offer wider proteome coverage at increased sensitivity, are likely to further reshape our perspective of urinary biomarkers for LN.

Indexed as

BiomarkersLupus NephritisHumansPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkerslupus nephritisnoninvasive biomarkerssystemic lupus erythematosusurinary biomarkersurine analyte

Identifiers

PMID39370040
PMCPMC13524136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.