Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39369684›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

Prediction of pathological complete response to chemotherapy for breast cancer using deep neural network with uncertainty quantification.

Bowen Jing, Kai Wang, Erich Schmitz, Shanshan Tang, Yunxiang Li, You Zhang, Jing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. [Artificial intelligence in predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: current advances and challenges].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Improvement in breast lesion classification utilizing deep learning and treatment response assessment maps (TRAMs).Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bowen JingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Kai WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Erich SchmitzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Shanshan TangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Yunxiang LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
You ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Jing WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Funding

A Multifaceted Radiomics Model to Predict Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis for Involved Nodal Radiation TherapyR01CA251792 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI David Jonathan Sher, Jing Wang · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA251792NIH HHS R01CA251792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe I-SPY 2 trial is a national-wide, multi-institutional clinical trial designed to evaluate multiple new therapeutic drugs for high-risk breast cancer. Previous studies suggest that pathological complete response (pCR) is a viable indicator of long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer. While pCR can be assessed during surgery after the chemotherapy, early prediction of pCR before the completion of the chemotherapy may facilitate personalized treatment management to achieve an improved outcome. Notably, the acquisition of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCEMR) images at multiple time points during the I-SPY 2 trial opens up the possibility of achieving early pCR prediction. PURPOSE: In this study, we investigated the feasibility of the early prediction of pCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using multi-time point DCEMR images and clinical data acquired in the I-SPY2 trial. The prediction uncertainty was also quantified to allow physicians to make patient-specific decisions on treatment plans based on the level of associated uncertainty.

methodsThe dataset used in our study included 624 patients with DCEMR images acquired at 3 time points before the completion of the chemotherapy: pretreatment (T0), after 3 cycles of treatment (T1), and after 12 cycles of treatment (T2). A convolutional long short-term memory (LSTM) network-based deep learning model, which integrated multi-time point deep image representations with clinical data, including tumor subtypes, was developed to predict pCR. The performance of the model was evaluated via the method of nested 5-fold cross validation. Moreover, we also quantified prediction uncertainty for each patient through test-time augmentation. To investigate the relationship between predictive performance and uncertainty, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was assessed on subgroups of patients stratified by the uncertainty score.

resultsBy integrating clinical data and DCEMR images obtained at three-time points before treatment completion, the AUROC reached 0.833 with a sensitivity of 0.723 and specificity of 0.800. This performance was significantly superior (p < 0.01) to models using only images (AUROC = 0.706) or only clinical data (AUROC = 0.746). After stratifying the patients into eight subgroups based on the uncertainty score, we found that group #1, with the lowest uncertainty, had a superior AUROC of 0.873. The AUROC decreased to 0.637 for group #8, which had the highest uncertainty.

conclusionsThe results indicate that our convolutional LSTM network-based deep learning model can be used to predict pCR earlier before the completion of chemotherapy. By combining clinical data and multi-time point deep image representations, our model outperforms models built solely on clinical or image data. Estimating prediction uncertainty may enable physicians to prioritize or disregard predictions based on their associated uncertainties. This approach could potentially enhance the personalization of breast cancer therapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyNeural Networks, ComputerTreatment OutcomeUncertaintyAntineoplastic Agentsbreastpathological complete responsepredictionResNetuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID39369684
PMCPMC11656273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.