Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39369576›Full record

ReviewVaccine2024

Advancing influenza vaccines: A review of next-generation candidates and their potential for global health impact.

Jessica Taaffe, Julia T Ostrowsky, Joshua Mott, Shoshanna Goldin, Martin Friede, Pierre Gsell, Christopher Chadwick

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07063849 (A Pilot Study of the Effects of Pre-Existing Immunity on Influenza A/Texas/71/2017), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07063849 phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study of the Effects of Pre-Existing Immunity on Influenza A/Texas/71/2017 (H3N2) Virus Shedding After Human Challenge in Healthy Participants

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaniel Hoft, MD, PhDRan2025 to 2026Enrolled12ConditionsInfluenzaArmsA/Texas
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Influenza.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  5. mRNA Vaccines for Influenza: Hope for a Universal Vaccine?BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Stabilized mosaic hemagglutinin immunogens as novel universal influenza virus vaccines.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Update on Influenza.The American journal of the medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Causes and consequences of undervaccination in adults.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jessica TaaffeWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: taaffej@who.int.
Julia T OstrowskyCenter for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Joshua MottWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Shoshanna GoldinWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Martin FriedeWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pierre GsellWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christopher ChadwickWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfluenza vaccines are an essential tool for influenza prevention, control and preparedness. However, demand for them and their programmatic suitability globally is significantly influenced by their variable effectiveness against influenza illness annually, limited duration of protection and need for yearly updating and vaccination. As such, the World Health Organization and major funders, such as the United States National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, have strongly encouraged developing influenza vaccines with increased efficacy, breadth and duration of protection. Here, we review the next-generation influenza vaccine pipeline, focusing on products in clinical development, and compare their characteristics to currently approved seasonal influenza vaccines.

methodsTo identify and characterize next-generation influenza vaccine candidates, we conducted a comprehensive literature review, using the CIDRAP Universal Influenza Vaccine Technology Landscape as a primary reference source and extracting additional information from peer-reviewed manuscripts, clinical trial records and other media in the public domain.

resultsOur analysis reveals a robust clinical development pipeline for next-generation influenza vaccines, featuring a diversity of approaches to address existing vaccine challenges and several candidates in advanced stages of development. mRNA vaccines emerged as a predominant platform, as evidenced by the number of candidates focused on improved seasonal protection as well as combination vaccine candidates targeting additional respiratory viruses.

conclusionWhile still early in development, results from universal or broadly protective products are promising and warrant continued investment from funders. As most Phase 3 candidates are mRNA-based and include combination vaccines, it is critical to begin considering how these new products may become integrated into the current global influenza vaccine strain selection and manufacturing ecosystems, and existing immunization programmes.

Indexed as

Global HealthInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesHumansVaccinationVaccine DevelopmentVaccine EfficacyInfluenza VaccinesBroadly protective influenza vaccinesImproved influenza vaccinesInfluenza vaccinesNext-generation influenza vaccinesUniversal influenza vaccines

Identifiers

PMID39369576
PMCPMC11672241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.