ArticleGut pathogens2024
Identification of age-associated microbial changes via long-read 16S sequencing.
Article in Gut pathogens, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- DELTA: Strengthening human biological resilience with an N=1 digital health and dynamic biomarker protocol.PloS one · 2026Trial
- Bacterial taxa associated with lung cancer cases in Southeast Asians: a pilot case-control study.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as immune modulators in aging and age-related chronic inflammatory diseases.Ageing research reviews · 2026Review
- Dysbiosis-Driven Reprogramming of Secondary Bile Acid Metabolism in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Insights from anACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- The cellular senescence-metabolism axis: emerging insights into T cell dynamics in the context of biological aging.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Review
- Microbiome Shifts in Peri-Implantitis: Longitudinal Characterization of Dysbiosis and Resolution.International dental journal · 2025Article
- Alterations in the Gut Microbiota of Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cross-Sectional Study Conducted in a High-Incidence Region of China.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Intestinal Microbiota and Aging in People with HIV-What We Know and What We Don't.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAge-related gut microbial changes have been widely investigated over the past decade. Most of the previous age-related microbiome studies were conducted on the Western population, and the short-read sequencing (e.g., 16S V4 or V3-V4 region) was the most common microbiota profiling method. We evaluated the gut compositional differences using the long-read sequencing approach (i.e., PacBio sequencing targeting the full-length V1-V9 regions) to enable a deeper taxonomic resolution and better characterize the gut microbiome of Singaporeans from different age groups.
resultsA total of 83 research participants were included in this study. Although no significant differences were detected in alpha and beta diversity, our study demonstrated several bacterial taxa with abundances that were significantly different across age groups. With young individuals as the reference group, Eggerthella lenta and Bacteroides uniformis were found to be significantly altered in the middle-aged group, while Catenibacterium mitsuokai and Bacteroides plebeius were significantly altered in the elderly group. These age-related differences in the gut microbiome were associated with aberrations in several predicted functional pathways, including dysregulations of pathways related to lipopolysaccharide and tricarboxylic acid cycle in older adults.
conclusionsThe utilization of long-read sequencing facilitated the identification of species- and strain-level differences across age groups, which was challenging with the partial 16S rRNA sequencing approach. Nevertheless, replication studies are warranted to confirm our findings, and if confirmed, further in vitro and in vivo studies are crucial to better understand the impact of the altered levels of age-related bacterial taxa. Additionally, the modest performance of strain-level taxonomic classification using 16S-ITS-23S gene sequences, likely due to the limited depth of currently available alignment databases, highlights the need for optimization and refinement in curating these databases for the long-read sequencing approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.