Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39369246›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2024

Evaluating an early social communication intervention for young children with Down syndrome (ASCEND): results from a feasibility randomised control trial.

Vesna Stojanovik, Emma Pagnamenta, Sarah Sampson, Rachel Sutton, Benjamin Jones, Victoria Joffe, Kate Harvey, Elena Pizzo, Sarah Rae

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vesna StojanovikUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK. v.stojanovik@reading.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6791-9968
Emma PagnamentaUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK.
Sarah SampsonUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK.
Rachel SuttonUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK.
Benjamin JonesUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Victoria JoffeUniversity of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Kate HarveyUniversity of Reading, Reading, UK.
Elena PizzoUniversity College London, London, UK.
Sarah RaeOxford Healthcare Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research (GB) PB-PG-0817-20035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper reports the results from a feasibility trial of an early parent-delivered social communication intervention for young children with Down syndrome ('ASCEND'). The intervention focuses on developing children's early social communication skills, in particular responding to shared attention. The aim was to inform the feasibility of running a full-scale trial through National Health Service (NHS) Speech and Language Therapy (SaLT) services, to assess whether the intervention is effective in improving language skills before children with Down syndrome start school.

methodsThis was a two-arm feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), with 1:1 randomisation stratified by trial site, comparing the intervention plus standard NHS SaLT provision with standard NHS SaLT alone. We recruited 20 children with Down syndrome aged between 11 and 36 months through 3 NHS SaLT services, 19 of whom were randomised (10 - intervention group, 9 -control group). Pre- and post-intervention and 6-month follow-up assessments included language, social communication skills, adaptive behaviour, quality of life (parents and children), parental anxiety and depression. The intervention was parent delivered with parents having access to SaLT services and the research team during the intervention. Data were collected on recruitment and retention, standard care, treatment fidelity, acceptability of the intervention by the parents and speech and language therapists, feasibility of collecting health economic measures and suitability of the primary outcome measure.

resultsThe sample was sufficient for a feasibility study. The intervention (manual, support, materials) was positively received by the participating parents. Speech and language therapists also evaluated the acceptability of the intervention positively. Treatment fidelity which was measured by completion of weekly parent diaries and two adherence phone call was acceptable as 100% of the parent diaries were returned, over 90% of the parental diaries were completed correctly and 100% of adherence phone calls were completed. Retention was acceptable at 84% overall. The preliminary health economic data suggest that this intervention will be low cost. The sample size calculation suggests that 290 participants would need to be recruited, with 228 having a complete data set, for a full RCT.

conclusionBased on recruitment, retention and treatment fidelity, as well as the acceptability of the intervention to parents and speech and language therapists, a full-scale trial would be feasible in order to assess the effectiveness of the intervention.

trial registrationISRCTN13902755, registered on 25th August 2020, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13902755.

Indexed as

Down syndromeInterventionLanguageRandomised controlled trialSocial communication

Identifiers

PMID39369246
PMCPMC11453083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.