Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39369191›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2024

The clinical application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in immunocompromised patients with severe respiratory infections in the ICU.

Junjie Zhao, Yong Sun, Jing Tang, Kai Guo, Kaiyu Wang, Jiancheng Zhuge, Honglong Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Case Report: CavitaryFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Clinical relevance of lung microbiota composition in critically ill children with acute lower respiratory tract infections: insights from a retrospective analysis of metagenomic sequencing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junjie ZhaoZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, Zhejiang, China.
Yong SunZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, Zhejiang, China.
Jing TangZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, Zhejiang, China.
Kai GuoZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, Zhejiang, China.
Kaiyu WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, 324000, Zhejiang, China.
Jiancheng ZhugeQuzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Quzhou, 324000, Zhejiang, China. 2456958062@qq.com.
Honglong FangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, 324000, Zhejiang, China. fang124113@163.com.

Funding

Medical and Health Research Program of Zhejiang Province No. 2023KY1296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly targeted antibiotic therapy is crucial for improving the prognosis of immunocompromised patients with severe respiratory infections (SRIs) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has shown significant value in pathogen detection, but research on lower respiratory tract microorganisms remains limited.

methodsThis study enrolled 234 patients with SRIs in the ICU, and individuals were categorized into immunocompromised and immunocompetent groups. We compared the diagnostic performance of mNGS using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) with conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) and analyzed the value of mNGS in immunocompromised patients with SRIs in the ICU.

resultsAmong all patients, the pathogenic microorganism detection rate of mNGS was higher than that of CMTs (94.02% vs 66.67%, P < 0.05), both in the immunocompromised group (95.0% vs 58.75%, P < 0.05) and the immunocompetent group (93.51% vs 71.43%, P < 0.05). mNGS detected more pathogens than CMTs did (167 vs 51), identifying 116 organisms that were missed by CMTs. The proportion of antibiotic regimen adjustments based on mNGS results was significantly higher compared to CMTs in both the immunocompromised (70.00% vs 17.50%, P < 0.05) and immunocompetent groups (48.70% vs 15.58%, P < 0.05). In the immunocompromised group, patients who had their antibiotic treatment adjusted on mNGS results had improved prognosis, with significantly lower ICU mortality (8.93% vs 50%, P < 0.05) and 28-day mortality rates (30.36% vs 68.75%, P < 0.05) than CMTs. In the immunocompetent group, no statistically significant differences were observed in ICU mortality or 28-day mortality (20.00% vs 33.33%, P > 0.05; 42.67% vs 45.83%, P > 0.05).

conclusionmNGS shows significant value in detecting pathogens in immunocompromised patients with SRIs in ICU. For immunocompromised patients who respond poorly to empirical treatment, mNGS can provide an etiological basis, helping adjust antibiotic regimens more precisely and thereby improving patient prognosis.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingImmunocompromised HostIntensive Care UnitsMetagenomicsRespiratory Tract InfectionsAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticsBronchoalveolar lavage fluidEtiologyMetagenomic next-generation sequencingSevere respiratory infections

Identifiers

PMID39369191
PMCPMC11453054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.