ArticleBMC oral health2024
Influence of curing mode and aging on the bonding performance of universal adhesives in coronal and root dentin.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cuspal displacement, marginal adaptation, and nanoleakage in maxillary premolars restored with a novel auto-cured bulk-fill composite versus a light-cured bulk-fill composite: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Bond strength performance of a self-curing bulk-fill restorative system and light-cured restorative systems after aging: an in vitro study.Odontology · 2026Article
- Effect of solvent evaporation and photo-irradiation strategy of contact-cure adhesive system on bonding to root canal.Odontology · 2026Article
- Influence of immediate versus delayed dentin sealing on marginal integrity in indirect composite restorations.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Does simplification signify compromise? Evaluation of different universal adhesives on shear bond strength:Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Shear bond strength of three composite resins for orthodontic bracket bonding on enamel and ceramic surfaces: an in vitro study after accelerated aging.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
- Age-Related Alterations in SIBLING Proteins and Dentin Micro-Architecture: Morphological and Molecular Associations.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effect of short dentin etching and water storage on bonding of resin composite to dentin with universal and two-step self-etch adhesive systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Repair bond strength of composite resin to additively manufactured permanent resin materials: a comparative evaluation of light-cure, self-cure, and dual-cure universal adhesives.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Internal adaptation and micromorphological analysis of a new self-cure resin composite.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Size-controllable synthesis of hydroxyapatite nanorods via fluorine modulation: applications in dental adhesives for enhanced enamel remineralization.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of different resin composite restorations bonded to mid-coronal dentin and proximal root dentin using light-cured, chemical-cured, and dual-cured adhesives immediately and after aging. Nanoleakage and degree of cure were also assessed.
methodsEighty-four molars were divided into mid-coronal dentin and proximal root dentin. Each group was further subdivided into three subgroups based on the restorative systems used, which involved the utilization of light-cured, chemical-cured, and dual-cured adhesives. Half of the specimens underwent µTBS testing after 24 h, while the other half after aging. Representative specimens were analyzed for nanoleakage. The degree of cure of the tested adhesive systems was also assessed.
resultsAging showed a significant negative effect on µTBS results and led to increased nanoleakage (p < 0.001). Furthermore, in all subgroups, the µTBS values of proximal root dentin were lower compared to mid-coronal dentin, except in the aged subgroup for the system utilizing the dual-cured adhesive. The restorative systems with chemical and dual-cured adhesives demonstrated comparable bonding properties. However, the system with the light-cured adhesive exhibited the worst bonding properties after aging when bonded to proximal root dentin and cured at a large distance (p < 0.05).
conclusionsAll tested restorative systems were negatively affected by aging, and the regional dentin had variable effects on the bonding properties. Clinicians should exercise caution when using the tested light-cured adhesive in areas where the curing distance exceeds 3 mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.