Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39369163›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Conservation gaps for Brazilian bats, limited protection across conservation units and the importance of the indigenous lands.

Felipe Baia Rodrigues, Rafaela Jemely Rodrigues Alexandre, Simone Almeida Pena, Letícia Lima Correia, Thiago Bernardi Vieira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Felipe Baia RodriguesLaboratório de Ecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Altamira, PA, 68371970, Brasil.
Rafaela Jemely Rodrigues AlexandrePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Rua Augusto Corrêa, 01 - Guamá, Belém, PA, 66075-110, Brasil.
Simone Almeida PenaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Terra Firme, Campus Guamá, Av. Perimetral, Belém, PA, CEP 190166017-970, Brasil.
Letícia Lima CorreiaLaboratório de Ecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Altamira, PA, 68371970, Brasil. leticialimacorreia16@gmail.com.
Thiago Bernardi VieiraLaboratório de Ecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Altamira, PA, 68371970, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Brazil, there is 13% of the world's bat diversity, is the second most diverse group of mammals, playing a crucial role in providing ecosystem services that benefit humans. However, anthropogenic disturbances exacerbate processes of species extinction, shifts in geographic distributions, and phenological changes, despite efforts to safeguard biodiversity through the creation of Conservation Units and Indigenous Lands. Moreover, gaps in taxonomic knowledge and challenges related to species distribution hinder the effective implementation of conservation strategies in protected areas. This study assesses the contribution of Brazilian Conservation Units (both Full Protection and Sustainable Use) and Indigenous Lands to the conservation of bat species and their ecosystem services. It also presents maps illustrating species richness by trophic guilds and threat classification according to IUCN, including species listed as Data Deficient. The findings reveal low percentages of potential bat distribution areas within these protected regions, especially for insectivorous, nectarivorous, and frugivorous bats in the Cerrado biome, which are classified as Near Threatened. Additionally, the highest bat species richness was observed in the Amazon and Atlantic Forest biomes.

Indexed as

BiodiversityChiropteraConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsBrazilEcosystemEndangered SpeciesForests

Identifiers

PMID39369163
PMCPMC11455905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.