ArticleHeredity2024
Support for Y-compensation of mother's curse affecting lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in Heredity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mother's curse refers to male-biased deleterious mutations that may accumulate on mitochondria due to its strict maternal inheritance. If these mutations persist, males should ideally compensate through mutations on Y-chromosomes given its strict paternal inheritance. Previous work addressed this hypothesis by comparing coevolved and non-coevolved Y-mitochondria pairs placed alongside completely foreign autosomal backgrounds, expecting males with coevolved pairs to exhibit greater fitness due to Y-compensation. To date, no evidence for Y-compensation has been found. That experimental design assumes Y-chromosomes compensate via direct interaction with mitochondria and/or coevolved autosomes are unimportant in its function or elucidation. If Y-chromosomes instead compensate by modifying autosomal targets (or its elucidation requires coevolved autosomes), then this design could fail to detect Y-compensation. Here we address if Y-chromosomes ameliorate mitochondrial mutations affecting male lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster. Using three disparate populations we compared lifespan among males with coevolved and non-coevolved Y-mitochondria pairs placed alongside autosomal backgrounds coevolved with mitochondria. We found coevolved pairs exhibited lower mortality risk relative to non-coevolved pairs. In contrast, no such pattern was observed when coevolved and non-coevolved pairs were placed alongside non-coevolved autosomes, as with previous studies. These data are consistent with Y-compensation and highlight the importance of autosomes in this capacity. However, we cannot fully exclude the possibility that Y-autosomal coevolution independent of mitochondrial mutations contributed to our results. Regardless, modern practices in medicine, conservation, and agriculture that introduce foreign Y-chromosomes into non-coevolved backgrounds should be used with caution, as they may disrupt Y-autosome coadaptation and/or inadvertently unbridle mother's curse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.