ArticleUpdates in surgery2024
Evaluation of the da Vinci single-port system in colorectal cancer surgery: a scoping review.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the Da Vinci® Single-Port system (DVSP) in the context of colorectal surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Pooled it
- Single-port versus multiport robotic colectomy for colonic neoplasia: short-term outcomes and learning-curve analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Single-port robotic total colectomy: technical standardisation and ergonomic considerations of suprapubic versus periumbilical access.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Learning curve for Da Vinci Single-Port robotic colorectal cancer surgery: impact of prior robotic experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Beyond multiport DaVinci®: a closer look at less commonly used robotic systems in resectional colorectal surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Shaping the future of surgery: A scoping review of current robotic practices in KSA.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026Review
- Single-incision laparoscopic surgery with transabdominal retroperitoneal approach (SILS-TRPA): a novel surgical strategy for sigmoid colon/upper rectal cancer.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Single-port robotic restorative proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: first clinical experience and technical insights.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- Single-incision plus one robot-assisted surgery (SIPORS) using the Hugo robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) system for rectal cancer.Annals of coloproctology · 2025Article
- Safety and feasibility of novel single-port robotic systems in colorectal cancer surgery: a comparative study with the da Vinci Xi system.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- The da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Platform in General Surgery: A Scoping Review of Current Applications and Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Single-portAnnals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in cancer: applications, challenges, and future perspectives.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Fissurectomy with or without anoplasty for chronic anal fissures is a valid alternative to lateral internal sphincterotomy: a retrospective cohort study of 475 patients.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives in the Era of Digital Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of colon and rectal cancer has gained popularity due to its association with reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery. The Da Vinci Single-Port (SP) System combines single-port laparoscopy with robotic assistance. This scoping review aims to evaluate the safety and short-term postoperative outcomes of utilizing the Da Vinci SP platform in colorectal cancer surgery. A scoping review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Data were collected from PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science Library as of December 22, 2023. Studies were screened and selected based on predefined criteria, focusing on the application of the SP robotic system in colorectal procedures. Data extraction included demographics, surgical details, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. A narrative summary of the results was provided due to the heterogeneity in study designs. From an initial 2312 articles, 22 studies were selected for analysis, encompassing 465 patients undergoing robotic SP colorectal surgeries. Of these, 384 (82.6%) had a cancer diagnosis. The median age was 65 years, with approximately 60% being male. The median operative time was 225 min, with docking times averaging 12-20 min. Conversion to multi-port laparoscopy occurred in 4.2% of cases, with no conversions to open surgery. Mean intraoperative blood loss ranged from 50 to 150 ml. The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved ranged from 15 to 28. A diverting ileostomy was constructed in 20.3% of patients. Median times to flatus and soft diet were 2.5 and 3 days, respectively, with hospital stays ranging from 3 to 11 days. Perioperative complications occurred in 15.1% of patients, including wound infections (5.1%), anastomotic leakage (3.7%), and postoperative ileus (2.8%). Negative margin status (R0 resection) was achieved in 95% of cases. The Da Vinci SP robotic platform demonstrates promising safety and effectiveness in colorectal cancer surgery. It achieves high rates of successful oncological resection, adequate lymph node retrieval, and minimal intraoperative blood loss. Postoperative outcomes indicate quicker recovery times and manageable complication rates. However, longer follow-up studies are necessary to fully assess recurrence rates and long-term survival benefits associated with this innovative surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39369142What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.