Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39369096›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Open laryngotracheal reconstruction for iatrogenic posterior glottic stenosis in adults: international multicenter experience.

Emilie A C Dronkers, Chadwan Al Yaghchi, Raymond J So, Sarah McBrinn, Mohit Achanta, Eleanor Rosario, Aphrodite Iacovidou, Alexander Hillel, Simon Best, Guri Sandhu

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emilie A C Dronkers *National Centre for Airway Reconstruction, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.
Chadwan Al Yaghchi *National Centre for Airway Reconstruction, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK. chadwan.alyaghchi@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5771-5096
Raymond J SoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sarah McBrinnNational Centre for Airway Reconstruction, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.
Mohit AchantaNational Centre for Airway Reconstruction, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.
Eleanor RosarioNational Centre for Airway Reconstruction, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.
Aphrodite IacovidouNational Centre for Airway Reconstruction, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.
Alexander HillelDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Simon BestDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Guri SandhuNational Centre for Airway Reconstruction, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePosterior glottic stenosis (PGS) has a significant impact on breathing and quality of life, and remains a challenging condition to manage. Literature does not provide a single optimal approach. In this study we aim to assess post-operative outcomes of adult patients with acquired PGS treated with open laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) with autologous or cadaveric rib grafting.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study included adults who underwent open LTR for iatrogenic PGS (2015-2023) and were followed for 26 months on average. Data on comorbidities, surgical complications, and interventions following surgery were collected.

resultsForty-three adult patients were included. Decannulation was successful in 76.7%, and 53.5% of patients required an endoscopic or open revision procedure for recurrent stenosis during the mean post-operative follow-up of 26 months. Patients with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 35), moderate to severe co-morbidity (ASA ≥ 3) or Chronic Kidney Disease were significantly more likely to fail decannulation after LTR. Diabetes Mellitus and ASA ≥ 3 were significant negative predictors for intervention-free survival. There were no significant differences in decannulation rate or intervention free survival between patients that had LTR with autologous (n = 26) versus cadaveric (n = 17) cartilaginous grafting.

conclusionThis study describes the largest consecutive multicenter cohort of adult PGS patients treated with open LTR. This technique significantly improves breathing outcomes in PGS, with minimal complications in selected patients with a healthy weight and few comorbidities. Patients with a BMI ≥ 35, ASA ≥ 3, Diabetes Mellitus or renal failure have less favorable outcomes, with respect to decannulation rates and intervention-free survival.

Indexed as

GlottisLaryngostenosisPlastic Surgery ProceduresTracheaAdultAgedFemaleHumansIatrogenic DiseaseMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBilateral vocal fold immobilityLaryngologyLaryngotracheal reconstructionPosterior glottic stenosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.