Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39369021›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2024

Modern CRRT systems are associated with lower risk of hypothermia.

Max Bell, Daniel Hertzberg, Fredrik Hansson, Åsa Carlsson, Johan Berkius, Laszlo Vimlati, Ann-Kristin Nilsson, Carolina Ekström, Marcus Broman

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Max BellDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. max.bell@regionstockholm.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7464-0324
Daniel HertzbergDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fredrik HanssonIRLAB, Integrated Research Laboratories Sweden AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Åsa CarlssonSunderby Sjukhus, Luleå, Sweden.
Johan BerkiusDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Västervik Hospital, Västervik, Sweden.
Laszlo VimlatiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ann-Kristin NilssonPerioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carolina EkströmPerioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marcus BromanPerioperative and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One risk of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is inadvertent hypothermia (IH), which is defined as a non-therapeutic core temperature decrease below normal. In continuous renal replacement therapy, heat loss will always occur from blood pumped through the dialysis circuit to cooler environment, predisposing for hypothermia. Blood flow and effluent flows are the most important parameters causing heat loss. We investigated and compared the novel TherMax warmer to previous generation technologies during CRRT in a multicenter setting. This was a prospective observational multicenter study with historic single-center controls. The study group consisted of 100 patients in eight Swedish ICUs with clinical indication for CRRT, using the PrisMax platform and TherMax warmer. Both patient and set warmer temperatures were recorded hourly for the first 24 h. The presence of treatment hours in hypothermia (< 36.0 Celsius) and the difference between set warmer temperature and measured patient temperature in the multi-center study cohort were compared to a matched single-center historic control cohort treated with the old Prismaflex platform and adjacent Barkey warmer. In the TherMax group 77/100 (77.0%) of patients, and for controls 26/86 (30.2%) of patients were free of hypothermia (Chi square, p < 0.001). The mean number of hours spent in hypothermia was (mean ± SD) 0.66 ± 1.60 and 6.92 ± 7.79 h in the TherMax and control groups, respectively (Chi square p < 0.001). In the study group the patient temperature was higher than the set temperature on the warmer with a difference of Δ0.47 ± 0.80 °C (minor difference), whereas in the control group the set temperature on the warmer was higher than the patient temperature with a difference of Δ4.55 ± 1.00 °C (over-correction). The novel TherMax warmer technology protected against hypothermia and was significantly more accurate than the Barkey warmer.

Indexed as

HypothermiaAgedBody TemperatureContinuous Renal Replacement TherapyFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSwedenAKIBlood warming devicesCritical illnessCRRTHypothermia

Identifiers

PMID39369021
PMCPMC11455880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.