Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39369014›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

3D bioprinting of fish skin-based gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) bio-ink for use as a potential skin substitute.

Nuttapol Tanadchangsaeng, Kitipong Pasanaphong, Tulyapruek Tawonsawatruk, Kasem Rattanapinyopituk, Borwornporn Tangketsarawan, Visut Rawiwet, Alita Kongchanagul, Narongrit Srikaew, Thanaporn Yoyruerop, Nattapon Panupinthu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Advances in vascularized organoids.Chinese medical journal · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nuttapol TanadchangsaengCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Kitipong PasanaphongCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Tulyapruek TawonsawatrukDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kasem RattanapinyopitukDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Borwornporn TangketsarawanDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Visut RawiwetCentral Animal Facility, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Alita KongchanagulCenter for Vaccine Development, Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Narongrit SrikaewResearch Center, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thanaporn YoyrueropMahidol University-Frontier Research Facility (MU-FRF), Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Nattapon PanupinthuDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ratirat SangpayapDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Anuchan PanaksriCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Sani BoonyagulCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Ruedee HemstapatDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. ruedee.hem@mahidol.ac.th.

Funding

National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) via Invention to Business (I-2B) Program N82A670613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), typically derived from mammalian sources, has recently emerged as an ideal bio-ink for three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Herein, we developed a fish skin-based GelMA bio-ink for the fabrication of a 3D GelMA skin substitute with a 3D bioprinter. Several concentrations of methacrylic acid anhydride were used to fabricate GelMA, in which their physical-mechanical properties were assessed. This fish skin-based GelMA bio-ink was loaded with human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ASCs) and human platelet lysate (HPL) and then printed to obtain 3D ASCs + HPL-loaded GelMA scaffolds. Cell viability test and a preliminary investigation of its effectiveness in promoting wound closure were evaluated in a critical-sized full thickness skin defect in a rat model. The cell viability results showed that the number of ASCs increased significantly within the 3D GelMA hydrogel scaffold, indicating its biocompatibility property. In vivo results demonstrated that ASCs + HPL-loaded GelMA scaffolds could delay wound contraction, markedly enhanced collagen deposition, and promoted the formation of new blood vessels, especially at the wound edge, compared to the untreated group. Therefore, this newly fish skin-based GelMA bio-ink developed in this study has the potential to be utilized for the printing of 3D GelMA skin substitutes.

Indexed as

BioprintingGelatinMesenchymal Stem CellsPrinting, Three-DimensionalSkin, ArtificialTissue ScaffoldsAdipose TissueAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell SurvivalFishesHumansHydrogelsInkMethacrylatesRatsBiocompatible MaterialsGelatingelatin methacryloylHydrogelsMethacrylates3D bioprintingBio-inkCritical-sized full thickness skin defectFish skin gelatinGelMA hydrogelSkin substitute

Identifiers

PMID39369014
PMCPMC11455937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.