ArticleScientific reports2024
Comparative analysis of the influence of BpfA and BpfG on biofilm development and current density in Shewanella oneidensis under oxic, fumarate- and anode-respiring conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biofilm formation by Shewanella oneidensis has been extensively studied under oxic conditions; however, relatively little is known about biofilm formation under anoxic conditions and how biofilm architecture and composition can positively influence current generation in bioelectrochemical systems. In this study, we utilized a recently developed microfluidic biofilm analysis setup with automated 3D imaging to investigate the effects of extracellular electron acceptors and synthetic modifications to the extracellular polymeric matrix on biofilm formation. Our results with the wild type strain demonstrate robust biofilm formation even under anoxic conditions when fumarate is used as the electron acceptor. However, this pattern shifts when a graphite electrode is employed as the electron acceptor, resulting in biofilm formation falling below the detection limit of the optical coherence tomography imaging system. To manipulate biofilm formation, we aimed to express BpfG with a single amino acid substitution in the catalytic center (C116S) and to overexpress bpfA. Our analyses indicate that, under oxic conditions, overarching mechanisms predominantly influence biofilm development, rather than the specific mutations we investigated. Under anoxic conditions, the bpfG mutation led to a quantitative increase in biofilm formation, but both strains exhibited significant qualitative changes in biofilm architecture compared to the controls. When an anode was used as the sole electron acceptor, both the bpfA and bpfG mutations positively impacted mean current density, yielding a 1.8-fold increase for each mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.