Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39369013›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparative analysis of the influence of BpfA and BpfG on biofilm development and current density in Shewanella oneidensis under oxic, fumarate- and anode-respiring conditions.

Edina Marlen Klein, Hannah Heintz, René Wurst, Simon Schuldt, Hendrik Hähl, Karin Jacobs, Johannes Gescher

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edina Marlen KleinInstitute of Technical Microbiology, University of Technology Hamburg, 21073, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9642-0218
Hannah HeintzExperimental Physics, Center for Biophysics, Saarland University, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8400-176X
René WurstInstitute of Technical Microbiology, University of Technology Hamburg, 21073, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6174-7613
Simon SchuldtInstitute of Technical Microbiology, University of Technology Hamburg, 21073, Hamburg, Germany.
Hendrik HählExperimental Physics, Center for Biophysics, Saarland University, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2708-0990
Karin JacobsExperimental Physics, Center for Biophysics, Saarland University, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2963-2533
Johannes GescherInstitute of Technical Microbiology, University of Technology Hamburg, 21073, Hamburg, Germany. Johannes.gescher@tuhh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-8810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm formation by Shewanella oneidensis has been extensively studied under oxic conditions; however, relatively little is known about biofilm formation under anoxic conditions and how biofilm architecture and composition can positively influence current generation in bioelectrochemical systems. In this study, we utilized a recently developed microfluidic biofilm analysis setup with automated 3D imaging to investigate the effects of extracellular electron acceptors and synthetic modifications to the extracellular polymeric matrix on biofilm formation. Our results with the wild type strain demonstrate robust biofilm formation even under anoxic conditions when fumarate is used as the electron acceptor. However, this pattern shifts when a graphite electrode is employed as the electron acceptor, resulting in biofilm formation falling below the detection limit of the optical coherence tomography imaging system. To manipulate biofilm formation, we aimed to express BpfG with a single amino acid substitution in the catalytic center (C116S) and to overexpress bpfA. Our analyses indicate that, under oxic conditions, overarching mechanisms predominantly influence biofilm development, rather than the specific mutations we investigated. Under anoxic conditions, the bpfG mutation led to a quantitative increase in biofilm formation, but both strains exhibited significant qualitative changes in biofilm architecture compared to the controls. When an anode was used as the sole electron acceptor, both the bpfA and bpfG mutations positively impacted mean current density, yielding a 1.8-fold increase for each mutation.

Indexed as

BiofilmsElectrodesFumaratesShewanellaBacterial ProteinsBioelectric Energy SourcesOxygenBacterial ProteinsFumaratesOxygen

Identifiers

PMID39369013
PMCPMC11455927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.