ArticleBlood advances2024
Identification of factors predicting low-risk febrile neutropenia admissions in adults with acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refining favorable-risk classification in pediatricBlood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Article
- Association between venetoclax concentration and febrile neutropenia in acute leukemia: a retrospective analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Impact of ceftazidime-avibactam on mortality in bloodstream infections: a cohort study in patients with acute leukemia.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractFebrile neutropenia (FN) is the most common reason for hospital readmission after chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is a major driver of health care resource utilization. Although FN risk models exist, they have largely been developed and validated for solid tumors. We therefore examined whether baseline characteristics could predict which patients with AML and FN have a lower risk of progression to severe illness. We identified adults with high-grade myeloid neoplasms (≥10% blasts in the blood/marrow) who received intensive chemotherapy and who were admitted for FN between 2016 and 2023. We collected baseline clinical and disease variables. Outcomes were: infections identified, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and survival. A lower-risk (LR) outcome was defined as LOS <72 hours without ICU admission or inpatient death. Univariate and multivariable (MV) logistic regression models were used to assess covariate associations with outcomes. We identified 397 FN admissions in 248 patients (median age, 61; [range, 29-77] years). The median hospital LOS was 6 days (range, 1-56) days; 10% required ICU admission, and 3.5% died inpatient. Only 15% of admissions were LR. Infection was identified in 59% of admissions. Physiologic parameters, including heart rate, blood pressure, and fever height, were the best predictors of LR admission and infection. We developed MV models to predict LR admission and infection with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 and 0.72, respectively. Established FN and critical illness models were not predictive of outcomes in AML, and we could not identify a LR group; thus, an AML-specific FN risk model requires further development and validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.