SynthesisSurvey of ophthalmology
Incidence and risk factors of perioperative suprachoroidal hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Survey of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Suprachoroidal hemorrhage (SCH) is a potentially visually devastating complication of intraocular surgery, but estimates of perioperative SCH incidence vary. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative SCH incidence among population-based studies published between 1990 and 2023. Thirty-five studies collectively reported 1657 cases of perioperative SCH from a population of 3,028,911 surgeries. The estimated incidence of SCH was 0.12 % (95 % CI, 0.10-0.14 %), or about 1 in every 800 surgeries. The estimated incidence of perioperative massive SCH was 0.06 % (95 % CI, 0.04-0.08 %). In multivariable meta-regression, greater SCH incidence was significantly associated with smaller study population size, comparative study design, multicenter study setting, and intraoperative or delayed SCH timing (vs intraoperative alone), while lower SCH incidence was significantly associated with vitreoretinal or mixed surgery type (vs. cataract) (all P < 0.05). Study year was not a significant predictor of SCH incidence, suggesting that the incidence of SCH has not decreased over the past 3 decades despite improvements in surgical technologies and techniques. Given the rarity of SCH, and the strong effect of study population size on reported SCH incidence rates, future studies of SCH incidence should include a minimum population size of at least 1000 surgeries to obtain an accurate estimate of SCH incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.