Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39368116›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of Saudi medicine

Effect of different patient positions on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing urological procedures: a prospective study.

Eda Tok, Nursen Karaca, Ozge Karakoc, Isik Alper

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eda TokFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Nursen KaracaFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Ozge KarakocFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Isik AlperFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7137-4120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe endotracheal tube (ETT) contains a cuff that is placed in the trachea to prevent gas leakage and aspiration of secretions and gastric contents. However, patient positioning after intubation may cause ETT displacement and changes in cuff pressure.

objectivesEvaluate the effect of different patient positions on ETT cuff pressure in patients undergoing urological procedures in supine, prone, lateral flank, and lithotomy positions.

designProspective and observational study.

settingA university hospital in Turkey. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients who underwent surgeries under general anesthesia in different patient positions were involved. After intubation (T0), the cuff pressure was checked with a manometer and adjusted to 25 cmH

main outcome measuresThe effect of different patient positions on the ETT cuff pressure. SAMPLE SİZE: 200 patients.

resultsThe cuff pressure increased significantly at T2 in the lithotomy, lateral flank, and prone groups (

conclusionETT cuff pressures are affected by different patient positioning; therefore, regular recording and adjustment of cuff pressure are necessary for patient safety. LIMITATION: We used ETT of a single manufacturer. Therefore, our findings may not be applicable to other types of ETT.

Indexed as

CoughIntubation, IntratrachealPatient PositioningPressureUrologic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedAnesthesia, GeneralFemaleHoarsenessHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharyngitisPostoperative ComplicationsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39368116
PMCPMC11454955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.