ArticleCurrent medical science2024
Enhancing Orthopedic Knowledge Assessments: The Performance of Specialized Generative Language Model Optimization.
Article in Current medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of knowledge base-optimized and unoptimized large language models (LLMs) in the field of orthopedics to explore optimization strategies for the application of LLMs in specific fields.
methodsThis research constructed a specialized knowledge base using clinical guidelines from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and authoritative orthopedic publications. A total of 30 orthopedic-related questions covering aspects such as anatomical knowledge, disease diagnosis, fracture classification, treatment options, and surgical techniques were input into both the knowledge base-optimized and unoptimized versions of the GPT-4, ChatGLM, and Spark LLM, with their generated responses recorded. The overall quality, accuracy, and comprehensiveness of these responses were evaluated by 3 experienced orthopedic surgeons.
resultsCompared with their unoptimized LLMs, the optimized version of GPT-4 showed improvements of 15.3% in overall quality, 12.5% in accuracy, and 12.8% in comprehensiveness; ChatGLM showed improvements of 24.8%, 16.1%, and 19.6%, respectively; and Spark LLM showed improvements of 6.5%, 14.5%, and 24.7%, respectively.
conclusionThe optimization of knowledge bases significantly enhances the quality, accuracy, and comprehensiveness of the responses provided by the 3 models in the orthopedic field. Therefore, knowledge base optimization is an effective method for improving the performance of LLMs in specific fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39368054What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.