SynthesisBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Mirror therapy for patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interventions to reduce kinesiophobia in breast cancer patients: a systematic review.BMC women's health · 2025Pooled it
- When body image and fear collide: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative (fsQCA) and mediation analysis of sufficient pathways to post-traumatic stress in breast cancer survivors.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPain and dysfunction of the shoulder and arm are prevalent among patients with breast cancer. This review aimed to evaluate current evidence regarding the effects of mirror therapy on pain, function, and quality of life in patients with breast cancer.
methodsFive bibliographic databases in English and Chinese, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched from inception to May 15, 2024. Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of mirror therapy to conventional treatment were eligible for inclusion. Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the effects of mirror therapy.
resultsFour randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 311 patients with breast cancer. All included studies were scored six to seven on the PEDro scale, indicating good quality. No adverse events related to mirror therapy were reported. Compared to conventional treatment, mirror therapy demonstrated significantly reduced pain (SMD: - 1.17, 95% CI: - 1.64 to - 0.70, p < 0.001), improved upper extremity function (SMD: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.05-2.02, p = 0.04), and enhanced quality of life (SMD: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.07-0.79, p = 0.02).
conclusionsMirror therapy is feasible and effective for upper extremity pain and dysfunction following breast cancer surgery. Clinicians may consider mirror therapy as an adjunctive intervention for breast cancer postoperative rehabilitation to advance the quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39368053What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.