Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367894›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024

Applications of machine learning in pediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI): a systematic review of the literature.

Marios Lampros, Solonas Symeou, Nikolaos Vlachos, Athanasios Gkampenis, Andreas Zigouris, Spyridon Voulgaris, George A Alexiou

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marios LamprosDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Solonas SymeouMedical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Nikolaos VlachosDepartment of General Surgery, Hatzikosta General Hospital, Ioannina, Greece.
Athanasios GkampenisMedical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Andreas ZigourisDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Spyridon VoulgarisDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
George A AlexiouDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece. galexiou@uoi.gr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is a heterogeneous condition requiring the development of clinical decision rules (CDRs) for the optimal management of these patients. Machine learning (ML) is a novel artificial intelligence (AI) predictive tool with various applications in modern neurosurgery, including the creation of CDRs for patients with pTBI. In the present study, we summarized the current literature on the applications of ML in pTBI.

methodsA systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search included PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and ScienceDirect databases. We included observational or experimental studies focusing on the applications of ML in patients with pTBI under 18 years of age.

resultsA total of 18 articles were included in our systematic review. Of these articles, 16 were retrospective cohorts, 1 was a prospective cohort, and 1 was a case-control study. Of these articles, ten concerned ML applications in predicting the outcome of pTBI patients, while 8 reported applications of ML in predicting the need for CT scans. Artificial Neuronal Network (ANN) and Random Forest (RF) were the most commonly utilized models for the creation of predictive algorithms. The accuracy of the ML algorithms to predict the need for CT scan in pTBI cases ranged from 0.790 to 0.999, and the Area Under Curve (AUC) ranged from 0.411 (95%CI: 0.354-0.468) to 0.980 (95%CI: 0.950-1.00). The model with the maximum accuracy to predict the need for CT scan was a Deep ANN model, while the model with the maximum AUC was Ensemble Learning. The model with the maximum accuracy to predict the outcome (favorable vs. unfavorable) of patients with TBI was a support vector machine (SVM) model with 94.0% accuracy, whereas the model with the highest AUC was an ANN model with an AUC of 0.991.

conclusionIn the present systematic review, conventional and novel ML models were utilized to either predict the presence of intracranial trauma or the prognosis of children with pTBI. However, most of the reported ML algorithms have not been externally validated and are pending further research.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticMachine LearningAdolescentChildHumansDeep learningMachine learningPediatric TBIPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.