SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024
Applications of machine learning in pediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI): a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The role of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic brain injury based on brain CT scans: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Clinical Trials for Central Nervous System Injuries.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic and prognostic applications of machine learning in paediatric traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of single and multimodal approaches.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Artificial intelligence for pediatric neuroimaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of ChatGPT-5 for CT Imaging in Canadian CT Head Rule-Positive Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Toward Child-Centred Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: A Perspective on Clinical Decision Support, Stakeholder Engagement and Education.Pediatric reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning (ML) in intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM): proof of concept.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- A scoping review on the essential role of global neurotrauma in achieving the sustainable development goals.Discover public health · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a prognostic prediction model for patients with traumatic multiple fractures and hemorrhagic shock using an Automated Machine Learning framework: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The Expanding Frontier: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neuroradiology.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enhancing clinical risk assessment in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma: A novel scoring system using ultrasound and laboratory data.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for traumatic brain injury imaging: a translational review from algorithm development to clinical implementation.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is a heterogeneous condition requiring the development of clinical decision rules (CDRs) for the optimal management of these patients. Machine learning (ML) is a novel artificial intelligence (AI) predictive tool with various applications in modern neurosurgery, including the creation of CDRs for patients with pTBI. In the present study, we summarized the current literature on the applications of ML in pTBI.
methodsA systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search included PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and ScienceDirect databases. We included observational or experimental studies focusing on the applications of ML in patients with pTBI under 18 years of age.
resultsA total of 18 articles were included in our systematic review. Of these articles, 16 were retrospective cohorts, 1 was a prospective cohort, and 1 was a case-control study. Of these articles, ten concerned ML applications in predicting the outcome of pTBI patients, while 8 reported applications of ML in predicting the need for CT scans. Artificial Neuronal Network (ANN) and Random Forest (RF) were the most commonly utilized models for the creation of predictive algorithms. The accuracy of the ML algorithms to predict the need for CT scan in pTBI cases ranged from 0.790 to 0.999, and the Area Under Curve (AUC) ranged from 0.411 (95%CI: 0.354-0.468) to 0.980 (95%CI: 0.950-1.00). The model with the maximum accuracy to predict the need for CT scan was a Deep ANN model, while the model with the maximum AUC was Ensemble Learning. The model with the maximum accuracy to predict the outcome (favorable vs. unfavorable) of patients with TBI was a support vector machine (SVM) model with 94.0% accuracy, whereas the model with the highest AUC was an ANN model with an AUC of 0.991.
conclusionIn the present systematic review, conventional and novel ML models were utilized to either predict the presence of intracranial trauma or the prognosis of children with pTBI. However, most of the reported ML algorithms have not been externally validated and are pending further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39367894What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.