ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2024
Mechanisms for assembly of the nucleoplasmic reticulum.
Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The responsive nucleus: morphological signatures of cellular state.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2026Review
- Progerin-induced nuclear envelope remodeling is shaped by cell division and NUP153.Journal of cell science · 2026Article
- Nuclear Entanglement: New Insights Into the Role of Cytoskeleton and Nucleoskeleton in Plant Nuclear Function.Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Detection of nuclear STING in cultured human cells and in the normal and cancer tissues.iScience · 2026Article
- Membrane curvature elastic stress triggers recruitment of PML-II onto the inner nuclear membrane.Molecular biology of the cell · 2026Article
- Primary envelopment of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus at the nucleoplasmic reticulum.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Extracellular membrane particles en route to the nucleus - exploring the VOR complex.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nuclear envelope consists of an outer membrane connected to the endoplasmic reticulum, an inner membrane facing the nucleoplasm and a perinuclear space separating the two bilayers. The inner and outer nuclear membranes are physically connected at nuclear pore complexes that mediate selective communication and transfer of materials between the cytoplasm and nucleus. The spherical shape of the nuclear envelope is maintained by counterbalancing internal and external forces applied by cyto- and nucleo-skeletal networks, and the nuclear lamina and chromatin that underly the inner nuclear membrane. Despite its apparent rigidity, the nuclear envelope can invaginate to form an intranuclear membrane network termed the nucleoplasmic reticulum (NR) consisting of Type-I NR contiguous with the inner nuclear membrane and Type-II NR containing both the inner and outer nuclear membranes. The NR extends deep into the nuclear interior potentially facilitating communication and exchanges between the nuclear interior and the cytoplasm. This review details the evidence that NR intrusions that regulate cytoplasmic communication and genome maintenance are the result of a dynamic interplay between membrane biogenesis and remodelling, and physical forces exerted on the nuclear lamina derived from the cyto- and nucleo-skeletal networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.