Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367888›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2024

Mechanisms for assembly of the nucleoplasmic reticulum.

Michael McPhee, Graham Dellaire, Neale D Ridgway

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael McPheeDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H4R2, Canada.
Graham DellaireDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H4R2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3466-6316
Neale D RidgwayDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H4R2, Canada. [email protected].ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0441-6228

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nuclear envelope consists of an outer membrane connected to the endoplasmic reticulum, an inner membrane facing the nucleoplasm and a perinuclear space separating the two bilayers. The inner and outer nuclear membranes are physically connected at nuclear pore complexes that mediate selective communication and transfer of materials between the cytoplasm and nucleus. The spherical shape of the nuclear envelope is maintained by counterbalancing internal and external forces applied by cyto- and nucleo-skeletal networks, and the nuclear lamina and chromatin that underly the inner nuclear membrane. Despite its apparent rigidity, the nuclear envelope can invaginate to form an intranuclear membrane network termed the nucleoplasmic reticulum (NR) consisting of Type-I NR contiguous with the inner nuclear membrane and Type-II NR containing both the inner and outer nuclear membranes. The NR extends deep into the nuclear interior potentially facilitating communication and exchanges between the nuclear interior and the cytoplasm. This review details the evidence that NR intrusions that regulate cytoplasmic communication and genome maintenance are the result of a dynamic interplay between membrane biogenesis and remodelling, and physical forces exerted on the nuclear lamina derived from the cyto- and nucleo-skeletal networks.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusNuclear EnvelopeAnimalsCytoplasmEndoplasmic ReticulumHumansNuclear PoreCalciumDNA damage repairExtracellular vesiclesNuclear envelopeNucleoplasmic reticulumPhosphatidylcholine

Identifiers

PMID39367888
PMCPMC11455740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.