Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367872›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2025

Unpacking the care-related quality of life effect of England's publicly funded adult social care. A panel data analysis.

Andrea Salas-Ortiz, Francesco Longo, Karl Claxton, James Lomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea Salas-OrtizCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1839-096X
Francesco LongoCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1833-7328
Karl ClaxtonCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2002-4694
James LomasDepartment of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2478-7018

Funding

EEPRU project PR-PRU-1217-20401National Institute for Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult Social Care (ASC) is the publicly-funded long-term care program in England that provides support with activities of daily living to people experiencing mental and/or physical challenges. Existing evidence suggests that ASC expenditure improves service users' care-related quality of life (CRQoL). However, less is known about the channels through which this effect exists and the effect on outcomes other than CRQoL. We fill this gap by analyzing survey data on ASC service users who received long-term support from 2014/15 to 2019/20 using panel data instrumental variable methods. We find that the beneficial impact of ASC expenditure on the CRQoL of both new and existing users is mostly driven by users aged 18-64 without any learning disability and users with no learning disability aged 65 or older receiving community-based ASC. Moreover, control over daily life, occupation, and social participation are the CRQoL domains that are improved the most. We also find that ASC expenditure has a beneficial effect on several other outcomes beyond CRQoL for both new and existing users including user satisfaction and experience, the ability to carry out activities of daily living independently, whether their home is designed around needs, accessibility to local places, general health, and mental health through reduced anxiety and depression. Greater ASC expenditure, however, does not address the need for other forms of support such as unpaid informal and privately-funded care.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAdolescentAdultAgedEnglandFemaleFinancing, GovernmentHumansLong-Term CareMaleMiddle AgedSocial WorkSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultadult social carecare‐related quality of lifehealthinstrumental variablespanel data

Identifiers

PMID39367872
PMCPMC11700955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.