Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367772›Full record

SynthesisHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2024

Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.

Hollie Birkinshaw, Claire Friedrich, Peter Cole, Christopher Eccleston, Marc Serfaty, Gavin Stewart, Simon White, Andrew Moore, David Phillippo, Tamar Pincus

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hollie BirkinshawDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0853-2995
Claire FriedrichDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5841-4324
Peter ColeOxford Pain Relief Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2762-2144
Christopher EcclestonCentre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0698-1543
Marc SerfatyUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8388-0776
Gavin StewartNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5684-1544
Simon WhiteSchool of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0096-251X
Andrew MooreRetired, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7932-5136
David PhillippoBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2672-7841
Tamar PincusDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3172-5624

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain is common and costly. Antidepressants are prescribed to reduce pain. However, there has not been a network meta-analysis examining all antidepressants across all chronic pain conditions, so effectiveness and safety for most antidepressants for pain conditions remain unknown. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of antidepressants for chronic pain (except headache) in adults. Our primary outcomes were as follows: substantial pain relief (50%), pain intensity, mood and adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were as follows: moderate pain relief (30%), physical function, sleep, quality of life, Patient Global Impression of Change, serious adverse events and withdrawal. Design: This was a systematic review with a network meta-analysis. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, AMED and PsycINFO databases for randomised controlled trials of antidepressants for chronic pain conditions up until 4 January 2022. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020171855), and the protocol was published in the Cochrane Library (https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014682). Setting: We analysed trials from all settings. Participants: We included trials in which participants had chronic pain, defined as longer than 3 months, from any condition excluding headache. Interventions: We included all antidepressants. Main outcome measures: Our primary outcome was substantial pain relief, defined as a reduction ˃ 50%. We also measured pain intensity, mood and adverse events. Secondary measures included moderate pain relief (above 30% reduction), physical function, sleep, quality of life, Global Impression of Change, serious adverse events, and withdrawal from trial. Results: We identified 176 studies with a total of 28,664 participants. Most studies were placebo-controlled ( Limitations: The evidence for antidepressants other than duloxetine is poor. For duloxetine, it is not clear whether the effect applies to groups with both pain and low mood, since these groups were excluded from trials. There is also insufficient evidence on long-term outcomes and on adverse effects. Conclusions: There is only reliable evidence for duloxetine in the treatment of chronic pain. Duloxetine was moderately efficacious across all outcomes at standard dose. There is also promising evidence for milnacipran, although further high-quality research is needed to be confident in these conclusions. Data for all other antidepressants were of low certainty. However, the findings should not be read as an encouragement to prescribe antidepressants where other non-pharmacological intervention could be equally effective, especially in the absence of good evidence on side effects and safety. Future work: There is a need for large, methodologically sound trials testing the effectiveness of antidepressants for chronic pain. These trials should examine long-term outcomes (> 6 months) and include people with low mood. There should also be better reporting of adverse events, tolerance of drugs, and long-term compliance. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020171855. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128782) and is published in full in

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsChronic PainPain ManagementAdultHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntidepressive AgentsADULTANTIDEPRESSIVE AGENTSCHRONIC PAINDEPRESSIONDULOXETINE HYDROCHLORIDEFIBROMYALGIAHUMANSMETA-ANALYSISMILNACIPRANMIRTAZAPINEQUALITY OF LIFERANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALSSYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Identifiers

PMID39367772
PMCPMC11474957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.