Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367634›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2024

Clustering Based on Laboratory Data in Patients With Heart Failure Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.

Sepehr Nemati, Babak Mohammadi, Zahra Hooshanginezhad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sepehr NematiDepartment of Cardiology, BooAli Hospital, Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Babak MohammadiIndependent Researcher, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8177-0725
Zahra HooshanginezhadDepartment of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart failure (HF) is a common condition that imposes a significant burden on healthcare systems. We aimed to identify subgroups of patients with heart failure admitted to the ICU using routinely measured laboratory biomarkers.

methodsA large dataset (N = 1176) of patients with heart failure admitted to the ICU at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, USA, between June 1, 2001, and October 31, 2012, was analyzed. We clustered patients to identify laboratory phenotypes. Cluster profiling was then performed to characterize each cluster, using a binary logistic model.

resultsTwo distinct clusters of patients were identified (N = 679 and 497). There was a significant difference in the mortality rate between Clusters 1 and 2 (50 [7.4%] vs. 109 [21.9%], respectively, p < 0.001). Patients in the Cluster 2 were significantly older (mean [SD] age = 72.35 [14.40] and 76.37 [11.61] years, p < 0.001) with a higher percentage of chronic kidney disease (167 [24.6%] vs. 262 [52.7%], respectively, p < 0.001). The logistic model was significant (Log-likelihood ratio p < 0.001, pseudo R

conclusionLaboratory data revealed two phenotypes of ICU-admitted patients with heart failure. The two phenotypes are of prognostic importance in terms of mortality rate. They can be differentiated using blood cell count, kidney function status, and serum electrolyte concentrations.

Indexed as

Heart FailureIntensive Care UnitsAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersclusteringheart failureintensive carelaboratorymortalityphenotyping

Identifiers

PMID39367634
PMCPMC11555613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.