ReviewVeterinary clinical pathology2025
Advancements in genetic analysis: Insights from a case study and review of next-generation sequencing techniques for veterinary oncology applications.
Review in Veterinary clinical pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancements in genetic analysis: Insights from a case study and review of next-generation sequencing techniques for veterinary oncology applications.Veterinary clinical pathology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) poses significant challenges in veterinary medicine, with limited treatment options and poor survival rates. While substantial progress has been made in characterizing human AML, translating these advancements to veterinary practice has been hindered by limited molecular understanding and diagnostic tools. The case study presented illustrates the application of whole genome sequencing in diagnosing AML in a dog, showcasing its potential in veterinary oncology. Our approach facilitated comprehensive genomic analysis, identifying mutations in genes that may be associated with AML pathogenesis in dogs, such as KRAS, IKZF1, and RUNX1. However, without supportive evidence of its clinical utility (eg, association with response to treatment or prognosis), the information is limited to exploration. This article reviews the comparative features of canine AML with human AML and discusses strategies to shrink the knowledge gap between human and veterinary medicine with cost-effective next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques. By utilizing these approaches, the unique and shared molecular features with human AML can be identified, aiding in molecular classification and therapeutic development for both species. Despite the promise of NGS, challenges exist in implementing it into routine veterinary diagnostics. Cost considerations, turnaround times, and the need for robust bioinformatics pipelines and quality control measures must be addressed. Most importantly, analytical and clinical validation processes are essential to ensure the reliability and clinical utility of NGS-based assays. Overall, integrating NGS technologies into veterinary oncology holds great potential for advancing our understanding of AML and improving disease stratification, in hopes of improving clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.