ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2024
Impact of rapid response system in mortality and complications post-orthopedic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRapid response systems (RRSs) are used in hospitals to identify and treat deteriorating patients. However, RRS implementation and outcomes in orthopedic and surgical patients remain controversial. We aimed to investigate whether the RRS affects mortality and complications after orthopedic surgery.
methodsThe National Health Insurance Service of South Korea provided the data for this population-based cohort study. Individuals who were admitted to the hospital that implemented RRS were categorized into the RRS group and those admitted to a hospital that did not implement the RRS were categorized into the non-RRS group. In-hospital mortality and postoperative complications were the endpoints.
resultsA total of 931,774 adult patients were included. Among them, 93,293 patients underwent orthopedic surgery in a hospital that implemented RRS and were assigned to the RRS group, whereas 838,481 patients were assigned to the non-RRS group. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the RRS group was not associated with in-hospital mortality after orthopedic surgery compared with the non-RRS group (odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80, 1.08; P = 0.350). However, the RRS group was associated with a 14% lower postoperative complication rate after orthopedic surgery than the non-RRS group (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84, 0.86; P < 0.001).
conclusionsThe RRS was not associated with in-hospital mortality following orthopedic surgery in South Korea. However, RRS deployment was related to a decreased risk of postoperative complications in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.