Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367492›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024

Computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram for prediction of lympho-vascular and perineural invasion in esophageal squamous cell cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Bin Tang, Fan Wu, Lin Peng, Xuefeng Leng, Yongtao Han, Qifeng Wang, Junxiang Wu, Lucia Clara Orlandini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bin Tang *Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Onocology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Fan Wu *Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Onocology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Lin PengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Xuefeng LengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yongtao HanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Qifeng WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Onocology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China. littlecancer@163.com.
Junxiang WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Onocology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China. wujx610@qq.com.
Lucia Clara OrlandiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Onocology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLympho-vascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) have been established as prognostic factors in various types of cancers. The preoperative prediction of LVI and PNI has the potential to guide personalized medicine strategies for patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). This study investigates whether radiomics features derived from preoperative contrast-enhanced CT could predict LVI and PNI in ESCC patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective cohort of 544 ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy were included in this study. Preoperative contrast-enhanced CT images, pathological results of PNI and LVI, and clinical characteristics were collected. For each patient, the gross tumor volume (GTV-T) and lymph nodes volume (GTV-N) were delineated and four categories of radiomics features (first-order, shape, textural and wavelet) were extracted from GTV-T and GTV-N. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to select significant features associated with LVI and PNI in turn. Subsequently, radiomics signatures for LVI and PNI were constructed using LASSO regression with ten-fold cross-validation. Significant clinical characteristics were combined with radiomics signature to develop two nomogram models for predicting LVI and PNI, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) and calibration curve were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the models.

resultsThe radiomics signature for LVI prediction consisted of 28 features, while the PNI radiomics signature comprised 14 features. The AUCs of the LVI radiomics signature were 0.77 and 0.74 in the training and validation groups, respectively, while the AUCs of the PNI radiomics signature were 0.69 and 0.68 in the training and validation groups. The nomograms incorporating radiomics signatures and significant clinical characteristics such as age, gender, thrombin time and D-Dimer showed improved predictive performance for both LVI (AUC: 0.82 and 0.80 in the training and validation group) and PNI (AUC: 0.75 and 0.72 in the training and validation groups) compared to the radiomics signature alone.

conclusionThe radiomics features extracted from preoperative contrast-enhanced CT of gross tumor and lymph nodes have demonstrated their potential in predicting LVI and PNI in ESCC patients. Furthermore, the incorporation of clinical characteristics has shown additional value, resulting in improved predictive performance.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaNeoplasm InvasivenessNomogramsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedEsophagectomyFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesContrast-enhanced CTEsophageal squamous cell cancerLASSOLympho-vascular invasionPerineural invasionRadiomic

Identifiers

PMID39367492
PMCPMC11451056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.