ArticleImplementation science : IS2024
Revisiting the scope and expectations of Implementation Science and Implementation Science Communications.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pragmatic randomized trial to compare strategies for implementing primary HPV testing for routine cervical cancer screening in a large healthcare system.Implementation science : IS · 2025Trial
- Addressing the How of Implementation: A Hermeneutic Exploration of Implementing Virtual Kidney Care in a Remote, Rural Health Region.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Analysis of real-world scale-up processes for school-based mental health interventions.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026Article
- What constitutes risk in implementation research? Perspectives from a qualitative key-informant study.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation studies: why and how to do them.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Using implementation science to promote evidence-based nutritional care in healthcare settings: A mixed-methods systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Review
- Implementation science grant terminations in the United States.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This editorial updates the scope and submission expectations of Implementation Science and Implementation Science Communications. We refine our protocol publishing policies and set out new expectations for reporting studies describing determinants and their relationship with implementation outcomes. Our central focus remains on the implementation of evidence-based interventions into healthcare practice and policy. We are most interested in rigorous empirical studies of the implementation of evidence-based healthcare interventions, practices, and policies, and the de-implementation of those that are demonstrated to be of low-value or no benefit. Alongside this, we remain interested in the systematic study of implementation mechanisms and processes and on the influences of patient, professional, and organizational behaviours. Novel theoretical and methodological developments are considered. For all submissions, we expect authors to demonstrate how their work is integrated with existing knowledge in the field and to clearly state the added value of the work to the field broadly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.