Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367473›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024

A novel 3D printed model for educating medical students on limb fractures: a randomized controlled preliminary study.

Yunfei Zhang, Hu Wang, Jiangpu Yi, Hongtao Zhang, Chuan Dong, Guoliang Wang, Zhengfeng Zhu, Wei Liu, Wen Luo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yunfei Zhang *Department of Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Hu Wang *Department of Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Jiangpu Yi *Department of Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Hongtao ZhangDepartment of Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Chuan DongDepartment of Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Guoliang WangDepartment of Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Zhengfeng ZhuDepartment of Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Wen LuoDepartment of Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China. lwdd1234@fmmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Research on the Application of Typical Cases Combined with 3D Models in Orthopaedic Clinical Practice Teaching 17BY136Research on the Application of Visual, Experiential, and Interactive Online Teaching in Orthopaedic Clinical Practice Teaching XGH20115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical education related to bone fracture must address numerous challenges including complex anatomical characteristics, diverse injury mechanisms, fracture typing, and treatment modalities. Our newly developed 3D printed model comprises components that may be combined or split to simulate various anatomical features, fracture types, and treatment modalities. This study aims to analyze the teaching utility of the new 3D-printed model compared with the traditional solid model.

methodsThis prospective study included 112 students randomly assigned to fracture-related education with a conventional model or the newly developed 3D-printed model. All students received 40 min of lecture, 20 min for femoral neck and 20 min for tibiofibular fractures, and a post-class quiz (10 min each) immediately followed. Scores on tests of fracture-related knowledge and user satisfaction were measured pre and post education for comparison.

resultsThe 3D printing group had an advantage in retention of anatomic knowledge, fracture typing and choice of treatment for the femoral neck fracture (P < 0.05). For the tibiofibular fracture the 3D printing group had an advantage in retention of anatomic knowledge and fracture complications (P < 0.05).Scores on the questionnaire survey also showed increased satisfaction in the 3D-printed model group(P < 0.05).

conclusionsThe proposed 3D-printed model can enhance the teaching effect significantly and has potential for widespread use in medical student education.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneModels, AnatomicPrinting, Three-DimensionalStudents, MedicalEducation, MedicalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleFemoral Neck FracturesHumansMaleProspective StudiesYoung AdultEducationFemoral Neck fracturesFibula fracturesPrinting, three-DimensionalTibial fractures

Identifiers

PMID39367473
PMCPMC11451155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.