Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2024
Phenotypes based on respiratory drive and effort to identify the risk factors when P0.1 fails to estimate ∆P
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Identifying and Preventing Ventilator Induced Diaphragm Dysfunction in Children
Analysis of Respiratory Drive Activation, Ventilation, and Pulmonary Aeration Resulting From Body Lateralization in Critically Ill Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methods to monitor respiratory effort during mechanical ventilation.Critical care science · 2026Article
- Assessing inspiratory drive and effort in critically ill patients at the bedside.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Are we prepared to monitor and prevent patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) during mechanical ventilation in pediatric patients?Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMonitoring respiratory effort and drive during mechanical ventilation is needed to deliver lung and diaphragm protection. Esophageal pressure (∆P
methodsSecondary analysis of physiological data from children and young adults enrolled in a randomized controlled trial testing lung and diaphragm protective ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) (NCT03266016). ∆P
resultsWe analyzed 953 patient days (222 patients). ∆P
conclusionsIn patients with PARDS, P0.1 commonly underestimated high respiratory effort particularly with high airway resistance, high tidal volume, and high doses of opioids. Future studies are needed to investigate the impact of measures of respiratory effort, drive, and the presence of a mismatch phenotype on clinical outcome.
trial registrationNCT03266016; August 23, 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.