Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367449›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2024

Impact of early continuous positive airway pressure in the delivery room (DR-CPAP) on neonates < 1500 g in a low-resource setting: a protocol for a pilot feasibility and acceptability randomized controlled trial.

Kathy Burgoine, John M Ssenkusu, Alice Nakiyemba, Francis Okello, Agnes Napyo, Cornelia Hagmann, Judith Namuyonga, Adam Hewitt-Smith, Muduwa Martha, Kate Loe and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kathy BurgoineMbale Clinical Research Institute (MCRI), Mbale, Uganda. kathy.burgoine@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7975-745X
John M SsenkusuMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Alice NakiyembaBusitema University, Tororo, Uganda.
Francis OkelloFaculty of Health Science, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Agnes NapyoFaculty of Health Science, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Cornelia HagmannDepartment of Neonatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Judith NamuyongaMakerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Adam Hewitt-SmithFaculty of Health Science, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Muduwa MarthaMbale Clinical Research Institute (MCRI), Mbale, Uganda.
Kate LoeDelft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Abongo GraceMbale Clinical Research Institute (MCRI), Mbale, Uganda.
Amorut DenisMbale Clinical Research Institute (MCRI), Mbale, Uganda.
Julius WandabwaFaculty of Health Science, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Peter Olupot-OlupotMbale Clinical Research Institute (MCRI), Mbale, Uganda.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm birth is the leading cause of childhood mortality, and respiratory distress syndrome is the predominant cause of these deaths. Early continuous positive airway pressure is effective in high-resource settings, reducing the rate of continuous positive airway pressure failure, and the need for mechanical ventilation and surfactant. However, most deaths in preterm infants occur in low-resource settings without access to mechanical ventilation or surfactant. We hypothesize that in such settings, early continuous positive airway pressure will reduce the rate of failure and therefore preterm mortality.

methodsThis is a mixed methods feasibility and acceptability, single-center pilot randomized control trial of early continuous positive airway pressure among infants with birthweight 800-1500 g. There are two parallel arms: (i) application of continuous positive airway pressure; with optional oxygen when indicated; applied in the delivery room within 15 min of birth; transitioning to bubble continuous positive airway pressure after admission to the neonatal unit if Downes Score ≥ 4 (intervention), (ii) supplementary oxygen at delivery when indicated; transitioning to bubble continuous positive airways pressure after admission to the neonatal unit if Downes Score ≥ 4 (control). A two-stage consent process (verbal consent during labor, followed by full written consent within 24 h of birth) and a low-cost third-party allocation process for randomization will be piloted. We will use focus group discussions and key informant interviews to explore the acceptability of the intervention, two-stage consent process, and trial design. We will interview healthcare workers, mothers, and caregivers of preterm infants. Feasibility will be assessed by the proportion of infants randomized within 15 min of delivery; the proportion of infants in the intervention arm receiving CPAP within 15 min of delivery; and the proportion of infants with primary and secondary outcomes measured successfully. DISCUSSION: This pilot trial will enhance our understanding of methods and techniques that can enable emergency neonatal research to be carried out effectively, affordably, and acceptably in low-resource settings. This mixed-methods approach will allow a comprehensive exploration of parental and healthcare worker perceptions, experiences, and acceptance of the intervention and trial design.

trial registrationThe study is registered on the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR) PACTR202208462613789. Registered 08 August 2022.  https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=23888 .

Indexed as

AfricaContinuous positive airway pressureCPAPLow-resource settingNeonatalPretermRespiratory distress syndromeVery low birthweightVLBW

Identifiers

PMID39367449
PMCPMC11451038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.