Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367394›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2024

Marginal bone loss and soft tissue health around two-implant mandibular overdenture retained with milled versus selective laser melted cobalt chromium bar: a randomized clinical trial.

Iman Adel El-Asfahani, Reem Abd El-Moatty, Gehan Fekry Mohamed, Hussein Abdelhady Hussein

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06401200 (Marginal Bone Loss and Soft Tissue Health Around Implants in Selective Laser Melted Versus Milled Cobalt Chromium Bar Retained Mandibular Overdenture), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06401200 nacompletednot on this map

Marginal Bone Loss and Soft Tissue Health Around Implants in Selective Laser Melted Versus Milled Cobalt Chromium Bar Retained Mandibular Overdenture:(Randomized Controlled Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMinia UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsDentalArmsbar retained implant overdenture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iman Adel El-AsfahaniDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, Minya, Egypt. eadel.asfahani@mu.edu.eg.
Reem Abd El-MoattyDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, Minya, Egypt.
Gehan Fekry MohamedDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, Minya, Egypt.
Hussein Abdelhady HusseinDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, Minya, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess marginal bone loss and soft tissue health around two-implant mandibular overdenture retained with milled versus selective laser-melted cobalt chromium (Co-Cr) bars.

methodThis research was set to be a parallel, triple-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Twenty completely edentulous patients received new conventional complete dentures according to conventional techniques. Two implants were placed at mandibular canine areas bilaterally, and patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups: the milled Co-Cr bar group and the selective laser melted (SLM) Co-Cr bar group. Marginal bone loss (MBL), modified plaque index (mPI), modified gingival index (mGI), and probing depth (PD) were evaluated at 0-month (baseline), 6-month, and 12-month follow-up visits. Repeated measures ANOVA test and Bonferroni's post-hoc test were used for parametric data as PD, while for non-parametric data as MBL, mGI, and mPI, Mann-Whitney U test and Friedman's test were used. A P-value ≤ 0.05 was set as the statistical level of significance. The study protocol was approved by the Faculty Research Ethics Committee at Minia University (636 4/10/2022). Registration for the clinical trial was made retrospectively on clinicaltrials.gov with ID NCT06401200 at 04/30/2024.

resultsThe follow-up period (one year) was completed without a dropout. Regarding MBL, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups throughout the study. However, the milled group showed significantly increased MBL from 0- to 6-month follow up period. In both groups, mPI increased significantly from 0- to 6-months post-loading. On the other hand, no statistically significant difference between the two groups was found regarding mPI and mGI throughout the study follow-up periods. The PD was significantly lower in the milled compared to the SLM group at the 6- and 12-month follow up period.

conclusionTwo-implant mandibular overdenture retained with milled or SLM Co-Cr bar can provide an acceptable treatment option for completely edentulous patients regarding marginal bone loss and soft tissue outcomes.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossDenture, OverlayAgedChromium AlloysDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedFemaleHumansLasersMaleMandibleMiddle AgedPeriodontal IndexChromium AlloysBar overdentureCobalt chromiumMilledSLM

Identifiers

PMID39367394
PMCPMC11452941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.