ArticleBMC oral health2024
Effects of frailty on patients with oral and maxillofacial space infection: a retrospective analysis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of pathogenic bacteria of oral and maxillofacial space infection and the effect of vacuum sealing drainage treatment.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Segmental airway volume as a predictive indicator of postoperative extubation timing in patients with oral and maxillofacial space infections: a retrospective analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the implications of frailty as a predictive factor for outcomes among patients with oral and maxillofacial space infection.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze 348 medical records, gathering data on several key aspects. These included the etiology of infection, the location of inflamed areas, the treatment administered, and the ultimate treatment outcomes. Additionally, the study collected information on the Symptom Severity (SS) score, frailty score, age, gender, the presence of systemic diseases, alcohol consumption, and smoking history.
resultsA total of 155 patients were classified as frailty, while 193 patients were classified as non-frailty. We found a significantly different in age, BMI, hospitalization expenses, length of hospital stay, SS, fibrinogen and admission to ICU between the frail group and the non- frail group.
conclusionsFrailty serves as a valuable predictor of outcomes among patients with oral and maxillofacial space infections. By identifying high-risk patients, frailty can be employed as a clinical tool to guide perioperative care, ultimately optimizing patient outcomes. Notably, frail patients often require more ICU treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.