ArticleBMC ophthalmology2024
Evaluation of the clinical effect of 4D digital strabismus and amblyopia visual function correction system combined with traditional comprehensive treatment methods on anisometropic amblyopia.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a 4D digital strabismus and amblyopia visual function correction system (4D-DSAAVFCS) in combination with conventional modalities compared with conventional modalities alone in children with anisometropic amblyopia.
methodsThis nonrandomized controlled study collected data on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), simultaneous vision, fusion vision, near stereoscopic vision, the amplitude of P100 wave (graphic evoked visual potentials), and the latency of P100 wave from both eyes at the beginning of the treatment and one year later. The Mann‒Whitney U test was used to compare BCVA contrasts in different subgroups, and the independent samples t test was used to compare the amplitude and latency of P100 wave contrasts in different subgroups. The basic cure rate, simultaneous vision recovery rate, fusion vision recovery rate, and near stereoscopic vision recovery rate contrasts in different subgroups were compared via the chi-square test.
resultsThis study included 393 children (217 boys and 176 girls) aged 3 to 12 years with anisometropic amblyopia who were treated at the Aier Eye Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2020 to December 2022. The children were divided into two groups, the 4D group (263 cases) and the traditional group (130 cases), on the basis of the treatment modality. The children in the traditional group received treatment through the conventional method of occlusion and regular training. Meanwhile, the children in the 4D group received treatment through the traditional method and the 4D-DSAAVFCS. The 4D group was divided into two age groups: 3 ~ 6 years (161 cases) and 6 ~ 12 years (102 cases). The basic cure rate of the 4D group was significantly better than that of the traditional group (χ2 = 4.318, P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the BCVA, the latency of P100 wave, or the amplitude of P100 wave between the 4D group and the traditional group before treatment (U=-0.117, t=-0.05, all P > 0.05 ). After one year of treatment, a statistically significant difference was observed between the 4D group and the conventional group in terms of BCVA, the latency of P100 wave, and the amplitude of P100 wave (U=-1.243, t=-0.853, t=-1.546, all P < 0.05). These results suggest that the therapeutic effect was greater in the 4D group than in the conventional group. The recovery rates of simultaneous vision, convergent fusion, divergent fusion, and near stereoscopic vision were significantly greater in the 4D group than in the conventional group (χ2 = 4.344, 4.726, 5.123, and 2.036, respectively; all P < 0.05). Additionally, the basic cure rate of children aged 3 ~ 6 years in the 4D group was significantly greater than that of children aged 6 ~ 12 years (χ2 = 2.365, P < 0.05). In this study, BCVA was significantly lower in the 3 ~ 6-year-old group than in the 6 ~ 12-year-old group (U = -1.267, P < 0.05). Similarly, the amplitude of P100 wave was also significantly greater in the 3 ~ 6-year-old group than in the 6 ~ 12-year-old group (t = -1877, P < 0.05). The latency of P100 wave was lower in the 3 ~ 6-year-old group than in the 6 ~ 12-year-old group (t=-0.998, P < 0.05). Additionally, the recovery rate of near stereoscopic vision was significantly greater in the 3 ~ 6-year-old group than in the 6 ~ 12-year-old group (χ2 = 4.534, P < 0.05).
conclusionThe combination of the traditional method with the 4D-DSAAVFCS was more effective than the traditional method alone in treating amblyopic children. This approach was particularly helpful in improving the visual acuity of the children and restoring their optic nerve conduction function, simultaneous vision, fusion vision, and near stereoscopic vision. The combination of the traditional method and the 4D-DSAAVFCS is more effective for younger children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.