Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367368›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Mechanical analysis of modified femoral neck system in the treatment of osteoporotic femoral neck fractures.

Chong Nan, Yuxiu Liu, Di Zhang, Yazhuo Qin, Hetong Yu, Yong Liu, Zhanbei Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Torsional Stability of the Femoral Neck System for Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation: A Finite-element Analysis.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chong Nan *Department of Orthopedic, Baoding No. 1 Central Hospital, Baoding, Hebei Province, 071000, China.
Yuxiu Liu *Department of Orthopedic, Baoding No. 1 Central Hospital, Baoding, Hebei Province, 071000, China.
Di ZhangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, China.
Yazhuo QinDepartment of Orthopedic, Baoding No. 1 Central Hospital, Baoding, Hebei Province, 071000, China.
Hetong YuDepartment of Orthopedic, Baoding No. 1 Central Hospital, Baoding, Hebei Province, 071000, China.
Yong LiuDepartment of Orthopedic, Baoding No. 1 Central Hospital, Baoding, Hebei Province, 071000, China.
Zhanbei MaDepartment of Orthopedic, Baoding No. 1 Central Hospital, Baoding, Hebei Province, 071000, China. nanch.md@foxmail.com.

Funding

Baoding City Science and Technology Plan Project 2241ZF228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the explicit biomechanical advantages associated with FNS, it is currently inconclusive, based on the existing literature, whether Femoral Neck System (FNS) outperforms Cannulated cancellous screws (CSS) in all aspects. Due to variances in bone morphology and bone density between the elderly and young cohorts, additional research is warranted to ascertain whether the benefits of FNS remain applicable to elderly osteoporosis patients. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical properties of FNS in osteoporotic femoral neck fractures and propose optimization strategies including additional anti-rotation screw.

methodsThe Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture models were reconstructed using finite element numerical techniques. The CSS, FNS, and modified FNS (M-FNS) models were created based on features and parameterization. The various internal fixations were individually assembled with the assigned normal and osteoporotic models. In the static analysis mode, uniform stress loads were imposed on all models. The deformation and stress variations of the femur and internal fixation models were recorded. Simultaneously, descriptions of shear stress and strain energy were also incorporated into the figures.

resultsFollowing bone mass reduction, deformations in CSS, FNS, and M-FNS increased by 47%, 52%, and 40%, respectively. The equivalent stress increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 3%, 43%, 17%, respectively. Meanwhile, variations in strain energy and shear stress were observed. The strain energy increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 4%, 76%, and 5%, respectively. The shear stress increments for CSS, FNS, and M-FNS were 4%, 65% and 44%, respectively. Within the osteoporotic model, M-FNS demonstrated the lowest total displacement, shear stress, and strain energy.

conclusionModified FNS showed better stability in the osteoporotic model (OM). Using FNS alone may not exhibit immediate shear resistance advantages in OM. Concurrently, the addition of one anti-rotation screw can be regarded as a potential optimization choice, ensuring a harmonious alignment with the structural characteristics of FNS.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsFemoral Neck FracturesFinite Element AnalysisFracture Fixation, InternalOsteoporotic FracturesAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaBone DensityFemaleFemur NeckHumansStress, MechanicalFemoral neck fracturesFemoral neck systemFinite element analysisOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID39367368
PMCPMC11452960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.